Showing posts with label Bryan Close. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bryan Close. Show all posts

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Temporary Restraining Order Lifted In Park Artist Case - Enforcement Begins Today













Union Square Park. The Parks Department began affixing Expressive Matter vending rule signs last week after the Appellate Division, First Department of the New York State Supreme Court struck down a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that had been in effect since last Summer.

The City will begin enforcing the Parks Department rules today which limits the number and location of street vendors who sell art in four parks. The new Parks Department rules went into effect on July 19, 2010.

According to the lawsuit, the City is seeking to limit and restrict “expressive matter” vending in four Manhattan parks - Central Park, Union Square Park, Battery Park and the High Line, as well as on the sidewalks adjacent to them. The four parks are run either entirely or in large part by public/private partnerships. The artists contend the new rules infringe on their rights to free expression and equal protection under the New York State Constitution; violate New York State and New York City human rights laws; and contradict New York City Local Laws and the Administrative Code.

Two other lawsuits in Federal court are also currently pending on this issue.

On Tuesday evening, PEP Inspector Robert Reeves sent out an email stating they have just learned that the courts "have ruled in our favor" and beginning Wednesday May 18th, they will "once again begin education by handing out the FAQs and taking down info of those we have spoken with," he wrote.

According to sources, PEP have attemped to collect contact information from vendors but only a few have complied.

"We must also check to see that the signage indicated the EMV rules are posted. We also need to check to make sure all medallions are in place at the 4 designated parks. Enforcement will begin this Saturday 5/21," Inspector Reeves wrote.

PEP officers began attending Expressive Matter training classes last week in preparation of enforcing the new Park rules. – Geoffrey Croft

(Photos: © Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) Click on images to enlarge.


Manhattan

New York City officials can start limiting the number and location of street vendors who sell art, photography and similar wares in some of the city's most congested parks, a state appeals court has ruled, according to Thomson Reuters.


In Union Square Park vending spots will be reduced to 18 on Greenmarket days and 58 the remaining times.


Tuesday's decision, by the Appellate Division, First Department, was the latest round in a legal battle that began last summer, when several artists sued the city's Department of Parks and Recreation, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other city officials over the new regulations, for violating their constitutional rights to free speech and equal protection.

Those lawsuits are still pending in both state and federal courts, but the appeals court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction and lifted a temporary restraining order that had been in place since the lawsuits were filed.

"We can start enforcing the rules right now," said Gabriel Taussig, chief of the administrative law division in the New York City Law Department. "We've discussed that with Parks and they are formulating their plans."


Union Square West. Dangerous Going. Vendors feel its only a matter of time before someone is hit by a vehicle. According to the new park rules they must vend directly behind medallions the City has affixed on the ground which puts them precariously close to traffic.


The plaintiffs also sought a preliminary injunction in federal court, but that motion was denied last July.

"We are extremely pleased with the appellate court's decision," said Julie Steiner, who represented the city in the state appeal. She added that the city's rules are "narrowly-tailored, content-neutral regulations" and do not infringe on the vendors' First Amendment rights.

The plaintiffs are "very disappointed," said their attorney, Jon Schuyler Brooks, but he added that "we are reviewing our options." The plaintiffs did not immediately appeal the ruling to the Court of Appeals, New York's high court.

The regulations limit the selling of "expressive matter" -- for example, art, photography and books -- to a total of 100 designated spots in four of the most heavily visited city parks: Union Square Park, Battery Park, High Line Park, and portions of Central Park. Such vendors do not require a permit.

Only one vendor would be allowed at each site, on a first-come, first-served basis. In their complaint, the plaintiffs argued that vendors were spending the night on the perimeter of the restricted parks in order to be the first to claim one of the few designated spots. That resulted in a "survival of the fittest" system, "which has a discriminatory effect on women, the elderly, and the disabled, who are unable to fairly compete with others for the designated spots," the lawsuit said.

In its ruling, the court found that the city "has a significant interest in preserving and promoting the scenic beauty of its parks," which includes "providing sufficient areas for recreational uses and preventing congestion." The court ruled that existing restrictions were "no longer sufficient" to balance the interests of the vendors and the general public.

The city will start enforcing the rules in High Line Park on Saturday and in the other three parks on Monday.

The case is Diane Dua et al v. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation et al, New York Appellate Division, No. 5122N-110344/10.

For Diane Dua et al: Jon Schuyler Brooks of Phillips Nizer.

For the city: Julie Steiner of the New York City Law Department.


July 19, 2010. An artist's depiction of Mayor Michael Bloomberg stomping on rights protected under the the Constitution.


Read More:


Restrictions are a go for vendors in NYC parks

Thomson Reuters - May 18, 2011 - By Jennifer Golson


Appeals Court Rules Against Artists in Dua v. City of New York Department of Parks Suit

Central Park Portrait Exchange - May 18, 2011 - By Peter Walsh



Panel Finds Vendor Restrictions Do Not Violate Free Speech Rights

New York Law Journal - May 18, 2011 - By Andrew Keshner


A Walk In The Park - February 1, 2011


City Blocked Again From Enforcing New Artist Vending Rules In Parks

A Walk In The Park - December 20, 2010


Phillips Nizer LLP persuades appeals court to enjoin enforcement of new rules
Phillips Nizer LLP - Press release - December 17, 2010

The Wall Street Journal - December 18, 2001 - By Pia Cottan

December 17, 2010 - By Peter Walsh

A Walk In The Park - September 2, 2010

A Walk In The Park - August 30, 2010

A Walk In The Park - July 15, 2010 - By Geoffrey Croft

Artist Vendors: Locals Want Us To Stay In City Parks

A Walk In The Park - April 21, 2011





Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Judge Extends Artists’ Right To Display & Sell In NYC Parks

"Perhaps the City now will concede it has wasted enough tax-payer treasure on this effort to remove original artists from the sidewalks.” - Plaintiff's attorney.


Artist Market In Union Square Park - October 24, 2010. The Bloomberg administration is seeking to severely limit the number of artists allowed to display and sell their works in four Parks Department properties in Manhattan the lawsuit contends. The four properties are run by public/private partnerships. (Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) Click on images to enlarge.

Manhattan

The City has once again been blocked from enforcing new artist vending rules in four parks. The Appellate Division, First Department has granted the artist's motion to prohibit the City from enforcing new vending rules pending their appeal of the trial court's denial of the preliminary injunction. The City is prohibited from enforcing the new rules until the Appellate Division hears and decides the appeal. The appeal is not expected to be heard until sometime in April or May.

The new Parks Department rules went into effect on July 19, 2010. The City is seeking to limit and restrict “expressive matter” vending in four Manhattan parks - Central Park, Union Square Park, Battery Park and the High Line, as well as on the sidewalks adjacent to them. The four parks are run by public/private partnerships. According to the suit, the artists contend the new rules infringe on their rights to free expression and equal protection under the New York State Constitution; violate New York State and New York City human rights laws; and contradict New York City Local Laws and the Administrative Code.

"Great news," said plaintiff Diane I. Dua when reached by phone this afternoon in response to today's decision. "I am very excited to have this relief into the Spring thanks to our wonderful lawyers at Phillips Nizer who truly believe in our cause. This is our constitutional right and we will not back down."

"For me Spring is just as busy as Christmas," plaintiff Bryan Close said this afternoon. Mr. Close sells at Union Square Park three to four days a week. "It's a sigh of relief."

On August 4, 2010 Phillips Nizer commenced the lawsuit in State Supreme Court. They filed a preliminary injunction motion on August 25, 2010, and simultaneously applied for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to stop the defendants from enforcing the new rules. A TRO was granted the same day by Supreme Court Justice Martin Schoenfeld, and the government’s subsequent attempts to stay and vacate the TRO were rejected, respectively, by Justice Rosalyn Richter of the Appellate Division and Justice Milton Tingling, Jr., the trial court judge.

On December 15, 2010, Justice Tingling denied the preliminary injunction motion and lifted the TRO. The very next day, Phillips Nizer filed a Notice of Appeal and the emergency motion.

“The snow will melt. Spring will come. Crocuses – and canvases – will return to the City’s parks,” said Jon Schuyler Brooks the litigation partner at Phillips Nizer who argued the artists’ emergency motion. “As a matter of law, the decision by the First Department means the artists demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their appeal. Perhaps the City now will concede it has wasted enough tax-payer treasure on this effort to remove original artists from the sidewalks.”

Over the last two decades the City has allocated thousands of city employee hours and paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars in civil rights settlements to plantiffis in its fight against artists selling on park land.

Two other lawsuits in Federal court are also currently pending on this issue.

The Parks Department did not respond to a request for comment. - Geoffrey Croft

July 19, 2010. An artist's depiction of Mayor Michael Bloomberg stomping on rights protected under the the Constitution.


Press Release.

APPEALS COURT EXTENDS ARTISTS’ RIGHT TO

DISPLAY AND SELL IN NEW YORK CITY’S PARKS

Phillips Nizer LLP persuades appeals court to continue injunction against new rules

New York, NY – New York’s street artists have won the latest battle in the war being waged against them by the Parks Department. In a just-released decision, a full panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, granted the artists’ emergency motion to prohibit the City from enforcing new Parks Department rules that severely limit the rights of visual artists to display and sell their works. The prohibition will remain in effect until the Court hears and decides the artists’ appeal of the trial court’s order denying their request for a preliminary injunction. The appeal is expected to be heard in April or May this year. Consequently, the artists keep their right to display and sell their original artwork in and around the City’s parks well into Spring.

“The snow will melt. Spring will come. Crocuses – and canvases – will return to the City’s parks,” said Jon Schuyler Brooks, the litigation partner at Phillips Nizer who argued the artists’ emergency motion. “As a matter of law, the decision by the First Department means the artists demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their appeal. Perhaps the City now will concede it has wasted enough tax-payer treasure on this effort to remove original artists from the sidewalks.”

In the emergency motion to the appeals court, Phillips Nizer identified six legal errors in the trial court’s order. Those errors will be the focus of the artists’ appeal.

The new Parks Department rules went into effect on July 19, 2010. They seek to limit and restrict “expressive matter” vending in Central Park, Union Square Park, Battery Park and the High Line, as well as on the sidewalks adjacent to them. The artists contend the new rules infringe on their rights to free expression and equal protection under the New York State Constitution; violate New York State and New York City human rights laws; and contradict New York City Local Laws and the Administrative Code.

Phillips Nizer commenced the lawsuit in State Supreme Court on August 4, 2010, then filed a preliminary injunction motion on August 25, 2010, and simultaneously applied for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to stop the defendants from enforcing the new rules. The TRO was granted the same day by Supreme Court Justice Martin Schoenfeld, and the government’s subsequent attempts to stay and vacate the TRO were rejected, respectively, by Justice Rosalyn Richter of the Appellate Division and Justice Milton Tingling, Jr., the trial court judge. On December 15, 2010, Justice Tingling denied the preliminary injunction motion and lifted the TRO. The very next day, Phillips Nizer filed a Notice of Appeal and the emergency motion.

The Phillips Nizer team representing the artists includes litigation partner Jon Schuyler Brooks, real estate/government relations partner Kevin B. McGrath, senior counsel Paul A. Victor, and litigation counsel Jeffrey L. Shore.

New York State Supreme Court, Index # 110344/10

Diane I. Dua, Joel Kaye, Bryan Close, Tenzin Wangdu, Jack Diamond, Bayo Iribhogbe, Robyn Wohl, George Moran and Artists United, Plaintiffs, v. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (as a Municipal agency); Adrien Benepe (in his Official Capacity as the Parks Commissioner); City of New York (as a municipality); and Honorable Michael Bloomberg (in his Official Capacity as the Mayor), Defendants.

About Phillips Nizer LLP:
Phillips Nizer LLP has been engaged in a wide-ranging practice of domestic and international law for over 80 years. Established by world-renowned trial attorney Louis Nizer, the firm consists of lawyers who are well-respected leaders in their fields. The firm’s principal office is in New York City, with additional offices in Garden City, Long Island and Hackensack, New Jersey. For more information about Phillips Nizer LLP, please visit: http://www.phillipsnizer.com/

###

Read More:

City Blocked Again From Enforcing New Artist Vending Rules In Parks

A Walk In The Park - December 20, 2010