Showing posts with label Fred Kress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fred Kress. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Parks Commissioner Says It's The City's Job To Take Care Of Parks Not The Public

City-Wide

By Geoffrey Croft

The city's new parks commissioner says it's the city's job to take of it's parks. 

This surprising admission comes after years of the Bloomberg administration claiming it can not afford to maintain the city's parks and touting the benefits of private benefactors and the hundreds of so called public-private partnerships and freinds-of-groups it has cultivated.   

 "In terms of disparities,  the City does not have the money to have new parks and fund them," Mayor Bloomberg stated in March 2010 at the opening of Brooklyn Bridge Park when asked to comment on the disparity between the level of maintenance and operation funds of municipally  funded parks and others as a result of private funding deals.

Parks Commissioner Veronica White's comments appeared in a New York Times article on Monday which follows our story from four months ago on the disparity created by private gifts to parks. 

The Times article however failed to mention it was the government's job and not private money that is supposed to take care of city parks.  In a strange turn of events it was the city's parks commissioner no less, who pointed that out. 

"'Still, she said,  the city was not going to make friends groups pay for routine maintenance. “Where we have trusts and alliances,  the goal is not to shift costs, ” Ms. White said. “Parks are paid for by the tax base,  and they should be,” the article stated.  

The Times published the commissioner's quote without pointing out the discrepancy of the administration and the forcing it's citizenry to pay for basic maintenance.  

The Times has repeatedly failed to question this issue and in fact has published numerous articles supporting the last few administrations' increased reliance on these so called public-private partnerships whereby the public is being required to pay extra for basic government services. Services that are traditionally and legally required to be payed for as specified under the City Charter.     

Last year, Central Park received what is believed to be the largest gift ever given to an American park, $100 million, from the hedge fund manager John A. Paulson.
When Frederick J. Kress, who sits on the board of the Flushing Meadows-Corona Park Conservancy, heard about it, he had only one thought: What about us?, according to the New York Times. 
Flushing Meadows-Corona, which has been the setting for two World’s Fairs, is considerably larger than Central Park, at 1,225 acres, compared with 843. Last year, its conservancy attracted $5,000 in donations.
The park’s bicycle and walking paths are cracked and pitted, Mr. Kress said, and its natural areas are overgrown with invasive species. “Central Park is doing pretty well,” said Mr. Kress, who is also president of the Queens Coalition for Parks and Green Spaces, noting that though Mr. Paulson’s home on Fifth Avenue overlooks Central Park, he grew up in Queens. “I’m not saying he owes anyone anything, but how about you give Central Park $98 million and Flushing Meadows-Corona $2 million? That two million would have gone so much further in an underappreciated park.”
Mr. Paulson’s gift was only one of a number of large donations to the city’s parks: $20 million was given to the High Line in late 2011, an additional $10 million to Central Park this month, and $40 million was pledged to build a field house in Brooklyn Bridge Park, though the plan was abandoned. The gifts have put New York’s green spaces on a par with hospitals, universities and cultural institutions as objects of philanthropy.
The largess has delighted city officials, who say it will ensure that New York’s signature parks have the resources to remain pristine while accommodating millions of visitors a year. But the donations have also highlighted the disparity between parks in Manhattan’s high-rent districts and those, like Flushing Meadows-Corona or Van Cortlandt Park in the Bronx, that are in less affluent communities. In those parks, conservancies and friends groups must struggle to raise any money at all.
Christina Taylor is the executive director of Friends of Van Cortlandt Park, a nonprofit group devoted to the fourth-largest park in the city. Van Cortlandt, with 1,146 acres, is surrounded by middle- and working-class neighborhoods. A $1 million plan by Ms. Taylor’s group to overhaul the park’s trail system is about 20 percent complete but will soon come to a halt for lack of funds.
“It is frustrating, and it’s hard not to think, ‘Them again?’ ” she said, referring to Central Park. “We work very hard to do what we do. If we get a $50,000 grant, we’re jumping for joy.”
Friends of Morningside Park, a nonprofit group that solicits volunteers and donations for the Harlem park, does not begrudge Central Park its windfall. For one thing, the Central Park Conservancy, the nonprofit group that operates the park for the city, regularly dispatches its maintenance crews to nearby Morningside and a dozen other city parks, in its own act of altruism.
Brad W. Taylor, president of Friends of Morningside Park, has even seen a slight increase in contributions since the fall, when Mr. Paulson’s gift was announced. “Giving to parks has become a cool thing now,” Mr. Taylor said.
His worst fear, he said, is that the infusion of philanthropic dollars will result in less public financing for all parks. “That’s just a recipe for disaster,” he said, “especially in parks that cannot raise that kind of money.” The group has a wish list of modest capital projects that the city has yet to tackle, notably two bluestone staircases that are “falling apart,” as he put it, each requiring $1 million worth of work.
The big gifts have arrived as the total expense budget for parks, which includes maintenance, has fallen to $338 million, from $367 million in 2008. Nonetheless, under Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, $3.9 billion has been invested in new and refurbished parks through the capital budget, and 750 acres of new parkland have been created.
Veronica M. White, the city’s parks commissioner, said the department was committed to financing the entire park system. She defended the sizable gifts, pointing out that Friends of the High Line, under its management agreement with the city, was responsible for that park’s maintenance. The Central Park Conservancy, at the same time, covers 85 percent of the annual operating budget for Central Park, through donations from residents, corporations and foundations.
In addition, both parks draw residents from across the city, and tourists from around the world. “To keep Central Park and the High Line at the level they are with only city money just would not happen,” Ms. White said.
Still, she said, the city was not going to make friends groups pay for routine maintenance. “Where we have trusts and alliances, the goal is not to shift costs,” Ms. White said. “Parks are paid for by the tax base, and they should be.”
The unequal distribution of philanthropy is not particularly surprising, said Linda R. Cox, the parks department’s Bronx River administrator, who also directs the Bronx River Alliance, a nonprofit group. After all, most major philanthropists tend to live near a few parks in the city’s most affluent neighborhoods, she said.
“We can’t kid ourselves that some parks and some projects aren’t going to come to the notice of really wealthy donors more easily than others,” she said. “That’s something that as a city we are going to need to reckon with over time.”
While praising the recent generosity toward parks, Holly M. Leicht, executive director of New Yorkers for Parks, said she hoped that the city could devise ways to somehow share the wealth.
“Even though it’s great that there are individual gifts to individual parks, it’s a park system,” Ms. Leicht said. “That lends itself to having a broad-based fund or thinking creatively about funding.”
Mr. Taylor, of the Morningside Park organization, said the largest gift that the friends group had received in its 32 years was $10,000; a typical year yields about $50,000, which goes toward routine maintenance of the steeply sloping, 30-acre park.
But for many of the city’s parks, raising even $50,000 can seem an impossible dream.
Friends of Wingate Park, in Brooklyn, for example, recently won a grant from the Partnership for Parks, a joint program of the City Parks Foundation and the parks department, to help pay for materials to recruit volunteers and foster group identity. The amount: $800.

Read More:

New York Times - February 17, 2013 -  By Lisa Foderaro  

Bloomberg News - By Henry Goldman & Martin Z. Braun - October 26, 2012

Friday, September 16, 2011

Trees Under Attack - Arborcide Crimes

BOROUGH

City-Wide

As far as crime scenes go, the one in Floral Park was rather unusual. The victims: Three 12-year-olds. Each 15 to 20 feet tall. Slim builds. Oak species. The weapon: what appears to be a saw. The evidence: three stumps and some residual sawdust. The reward: $1,500 for information leading to an arrest and conviction.

New Yorkers take their trees very seriously. So when the three fallen trees alongside Hillside Avenue in Queens were discovered by community members in the aftermath of Hurricane Irene, outrage ensued. This was no accident, the locals decreed, this was a crime: an arborcide—and a premeditated one at that, according to The Wall Street Journal.

"Someone used some type of electric saw and cut them 95% through and left them standing and figured the storm, Irene, would be blamed," said Fred Kress, president of the Queens Coalition for Parks and Green Spaces. "It's just stumps out there, it's sickening. I don't really have any tolerance for this stuff."

There are punishments for arborcide: A conviction for removing or damaging a tree brings with it up to a year in jail or a fine of up to $15,000.

Some in the community think the punishment fits the crime.

"If you're going to do the crime, you have to pay," said Michael Castellano, a local civic leader who was at the crime scene this week.

Mr. Castellano was among a group of community members who alerted local officials to the incident. Council Member Mark Weprin got on the case (nothing like railing against arborcide to generate some community good will) and called for a press conference.

The authorities were called in and Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe deemed the arborcide a "serious criminal offense" and an "assault on our communities." The damage: more than $11,000 (and these were just your run-of-the-mill oaks).

Mr. Weprin is using campaign contributions for $1,000 of the reward; the remainder is coming from the Queens Coalition for Parks and Green Spaces.

In a city where asphalt reigns, trees are a precious commodity. The city's campaign to plant 1 million new trees is going strong, about halfway there, according to its website.

Neighborhoods frequently lobby for more trees, and casualties are obviously not taken lightly. In Crown Heights, neighbors were distraught last year when a serial tree killer was on the loose.

Tree advocates still haven't gotten over the willow tree that was cut down to make way for Jane's Carousel in Brooklyn Bridge Park.

And just last week, signs in Forest Hills began popping up urging residents, or rather their furry friends, to stop disrespecting trees.

"Try being force fed dog urine! every day and see how you survive," the sign reads. "Please help to keep these trees Living!"

Arborcides are more common than one would think. To wit:

• In March of 2008 and 2009, a total of 47 red cedars were vandalized in Inwood Hill Park in Manhattan.

• In September of 2009, seven trees in Lefferts Playground in Queens, planted as part of a Sept. 11 memorial, were destroyed.

• And no park has had it worse than Juniper Valley in Queens. In 2009, there were at least four incidents of tree destruction, with more than 20 trees affected. A year later, two young trees there were destroyed.

The mystery of the tree-hater plaguing Juniper Valley Park was never solved, despite numerous rewards offered (which included dueling rewards from City Council candidates).

In one case, 12 young cherry trees were cut off with a power tool and dragged around the park. Just last month, an evergreen was knocked down.

"It hasn't been a good few years for trees in Juniper Valley Park," said Robert Holden, president of the Juniper Valley Park Conservancy.

Geoffrey Croft, president of NYC Parks Advocates, said that in most instances those who get caught for damaging trees are contractors.

But he also points a finger at the city.

"The city is also committing arborcide," he said, pointing to an instance last year when it cut down 56 trees at Lincoln Center before Fashion Week. (The Parks Department, obviously, vehemently objects to this.)

In Floral Park, the tree-cutting episode has exposed racial tensions in a community that has developed into a "Little India," with an influx of Indian immigrants and businesses shaking up the old order.

The block where the incident took place includes Masala 2 Wok, Mumbai Xpress, an Indian astrologer and the forthcoming Balaji Super Bazar.

On the aptly named "Queens Crap" blog, comments quickly devolved into blaming "animals" who want "nothing to do with America."

The underlying assumption among some was that the owners of the new supermarket must have had something to do with it. The trees blocked the store's façade and a fourth tree on the block was conspicuously left standing.

As the scene this week, I asked Mr. Castellano if anyone had spoken to the grocery store's owner. He had not.

But minutes later, out came Rakesh Kumar, the owner, hand extended and eager to talk. Mr. Kumar called the tree cutting "very bad." He said his landlord had also condemned the act.

"People are pointing fingers at us," said Mr. Kumar. "First day it happened I said, 'It's a small tree first of all and it doesn't bother us.'"

He continued: "We know the rules and regulations of this country," noting that if they wanted to take the tree down they know they would have had to get city approval. He is now offering to plant new trees and to pay all the associated costs.

"According to our custom, we worship the trees," he said.

Mr. Kumar has his own theory about what might have happened. "We have a lot of competitors around here, our supermarket competitors," he said, rattling off the names of nearby Indian supermarkets.

And so the speculation continues.

Like so many arborcides, the Floral Park ones may never be solved.

Because none of the businesses appear to have surveillance videos of the trees, information is scarce.

"The investigation is still ongoing," said a spokeswoman for the police department.

For the time being, at least, this one appears to have everyone stumped.

Read More:


The Wall Street Journal- September 15, 2011 - By Sumathi Reddy