Showing posts with label Metropolitan Museum of Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Metropolitan Museum of Art. Show all posts

Friday, June 5, 2015

Central Park: Police Clear Out Illegal Vendors By Metropolitan Museum of Art In Massive Sweep


Clean Sweep.  Illegal vendors no longer block the bus stop in front of the The Metropolitan Museum of Art.  The three block stretch along 5th Avenue  between 81st - 83rd streets had been taken over in recent years by a proliferation of food carts.   City officials finally came up with a simple but effective plan -  enforce the law.  (Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates)  Click in images to enlarge.

Manhattan

By Geoffrey Croft

There is a museum behind those illegal food vendors on Fifth Avenue after all.

In what had been one of the more public displays of government dysfunction for years the city had allowed a flotilla of illegal food carts to overrun the area in front  one of the city's most prestigious institutions, The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Visitors will see a dramatic difference.

A solid wall of un-permitted pushcarts had stretched for three blocks, between 83-81st Streets.  On some days more than two dozen vendors occupied sidewalk often creating a hazard for pedestrians while blocking the bus stop and taxi stand.  

Last Thursday that mess seemingly came to an abrupt end as officials came up with a simple yet effective solution that had apparently been elusive, enforce the law.

On May 28th about fifty NYPD officers and employees from various agencies including the Department of Health,  the Consumer Affairs and the Department of Transportation descended on the hotly contested space.   They began assembling in the morning:  Police set up a mobile command bus,  officers from the Central Park and 19th Pct. mustered, tow trucks were positioned in place. Workers installed new bus and taxi signs during the operation. 

Backed by a small army of police officers officials began descending on the area around noon.  They offered vendors the opportunity to either move or have their carts confiscated.

One by one they complied.

Police have conducted enforcement sweeps there before but non like this according to several vendors.

So far the ban has held.




New taxi stand signs were installed.


The area is one of the most lucrative and coveted spots for food vendors in the city, due in part to the throngs of tourists visiting the museum.

A 19th-century law enacted to help returning solders from the Civil War allows disabled veterans the right sell food in locations including city parks without a permit.   The museum is on property controlled by the parks department.

The unsightly mess soon began spiraling out of control. The City through the Parks Department began losing hundreds of thousands of dollars annually in concession revenue.

The city's ineptitude for refusing to enforce the law on the illegal venders working in front of the bus stop and taxi stand has long confounded Dan Rossi, 65 who has very publicly battled consecutive administrations dating back to Mayor Giuliani in the 90's.  He butted heads with Tom Cusick,  the long-time head of the Fifth Avenue Business Improvement District who he accused of foul play.


Last Man and Woman Standing.  And There Were Two. The remaining two pushcarts are run by  legitimate disabled veterans.


He and his daughter Elizabeth have operated two carts in front of the museum since 2007.  According to Mr. Rossi things began going south three years ago when the city began allowing a proliferation of illegal vendors in what soon began to resemble an outdoor food bazaar.  He and daughter have been in and out of court contesting tickets and as fighting the city through lawsuits for years.  

"What took them so long," asked Mr. Rossi. 

For years he has been pleading with various city agencies to clean up the area and properly enforce the law.

"It was a simple solution that was always there. Do you know how many times I said to the DOI, (Department of Investigation) 'You can't vend in a bus stop or a taxi stand'?  They told me, 'Dan you're on your own. We're not going to enforce it. ' "


A sign on one of the two remaining pushcarts reads, "This Business is Owned and Operated by Disabled Veterans."


He and others also accused the city of looking the other way for what he describes as rampant abuses in the food vendor system by allowing "rent-a-vets, and food permits to be leased out without cracking down on what is a wildly known practice.

"Ninety percent of every food vending permits are leased out," he estimates.

"That's Rudy Giuliani who allowed that and Bloomberg was even worse.  He intentionally withheld permits from the vets."  

Mr. Rossi estimates he lost at least a million dollars over the last three years because of the city's inaction. 

"When I was by myself my cart was grossing $ 400,000 a year, then twenty-five percent of that when this mess started."

Rossi described the lack of enforcement as "a first-class screw up by the police."

"All of a sudden, by a miracle, they noticed that there was a taxi stand and a bus stop," he asks incredulously. 
"What took them so long to get rid of them," asked Barbara Morris, 67, a widow of a disabled veteran who has also been fighting with the city over this issue.  

"The bus stop and taxi stand have nothing to do with the lawsuit. It's been financially devastating." 

Ms. Morris mentioned fighting against the illegal operators including the non veterans and people leasing out the permits. 

"I hope things will finally turn around," she said.

"It appears that the NYPD’s efforts to proactively reach out to the vendor community has worked," the City's Law Department said in a statement.

"The community was informed of a recent court ruling limiting the number of vendors on each block in the area.  The Law Department represented the City in court and we are pleased with the court’s decision."



For years a solid wall of food pushcarts stretched for three blocks, blocking views and  bus stops and taxi stands.


Dan credits the new Commanding Officer of the Central Park Pct.  Christopher Mcintosh for cleaning up the area.

"There's a new sherif in town. He seems like a really decent guy," Dan says. 

"He came around and saw for himself, he said, 'I got a problem here.' "

The bus and taxi boarding zones are now kept clear, and only two vendors now remain directly in front of the museum.   To ensure he gets the spot Rossi, a former marine who served in Vietnam,  spends his nights sleeping near his hot-dog cart, parked in front.

"Can you believe I've been reduced to this," he asked rhetorically. 

Dan hopes the City will finally being going after what he describes as illegal permitting practices. 

" We just proved  (in court) that there are no restrictions for disabled vets selling food.  I just reversed twenty-five years of discrimination against the veterans.

"We hope they leave us alone."



(Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates)  Click in images to enlarge. 

Read More:

A Walk In The Park - November 2, 2011 

New York Post - October 9, 2011 - By Rebecca Rosenberg and David Seifman


A Walk In The Park - November 25, 2009

A Walk In The Park - November 25, 2009








Saturday, April 27, 2013

Metropolitan Museum of Art Lawyers Admit No “Formal" Agreement Exists Allowing Admission Fees


Metropolitan Museum of Art1 New York Metropolitan Museum of Art
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, situated on Parks Department property in Central Park, is facing two multimillion-dollar lawsuits by the public in Manhattan Supreme Court protesting the museum’s practice of soliciting the $25 entry fee.  The original six-page handwritten 1878 agreement, states the museum "be kept open and accessible to the public free of charge from 10 o’clock until half an hour before sunset” Wednesday through Saturday. 
Museum lawyers admitted there was no “formal amendment” that allows them to charge an admission fee.  
The Metropolitan Museum of Art faces a potential $40 million payout if it loses the suits which seek compensation for members and visitors who paid with a credit card in the past few years. A museum spokesman declined to provide a copy of the agreement with the city that dictates fee policies in exchange for generous subsidies and free rent at the Central Park site.
A Manhattan Supreme Court judge recently ruled the Bloomberg administration, using Park Enforcement Patrol officers, illegally issued hundreds of thousands worth of tickets to disabled veteran vendors in front of the museum.  

- Geoffrey Croft
Manhattan
The Metropolitan Museum of Art should not be allowed to charge patrons admission – and has been misleading the public about why it’s allowed to accept fees in the first place, according to city records obtained by the Post.
The Fifth Avenue institution recently argued it was granted permission to solicit $25 entry fees “after the museum received approval from New York City’s Administrator of Parks ... more than four decades ago.”
But the Post obtained all records governing the admissions policy between the Met and the city going back over 100 years, to determine if that document actually exists.
It does not.
In the original six-page handwritten 1878 agreement, the city gives the museum use of the Fifth Avenue building.
In exchange, it requires the museum “be kept open and accessible to the public free of charge from 10 o’clock until half an hour before sunset” Wednesday through Saturday.
Subsequent documents show that there were discussions about instituting fees between the city and the museum during Mayor John Lindsay’s term in the 1970s, but nothing was ever approved.
The Met is currently facing two multimillion-dollar lawsuits by members protesting the museum’s practice of soliciting the $25 entry fee.
Museum lawyers admitted there was no “formal amendment” to the original lease, but said in court papers that the city has long been aware of their “pay-what-you-wish” admission policy.

Read More:

The Met’s art of $$ deception
New York Post - April 27, 2013 - By Julia Marsh

Metropolitan Museum of Art Sued Over "Voluntary Admissions"
A Walk In The Park - March 18, 2013

Monday, March 18, 2013

Metropolitan Museum of Art Sued Over "Voluntary Admissions"


RECOMMENDED? A sign at the Metropolitan Museum of Art indicates you don’t really have to pay 25 bucks.
RECOMMENDED OR Forced? A sign at the Metropolitan Museum of Art indicates you don’t really have to pay $ 25 dollars. (Photo: Dan Brinzac) 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art faces a potential $40 million payout if it loses the suits which seek compensation for members and visitors who paid with a credit card in the past few years.  The suits were filed in Manhattan Supreme Court.  A museum spokesman declined to provide a copy of the agreement with the city that dictates fee policies in exchange for generous subsidies and free rent at the Central Park site.
Manhattan
A former Metropolitan Museum of Art supervisor claims he was often ordered to threaten the removal of visitors who refused to fork over the recommended high admission fees, according to the New York Post.
“I arranged for security officers to forcibly remove the museum visitors who demanded entry without paying,” the whistleblower told The Post.
He plans to provide evidence in two multimillion-dollar lawsuits against the museum brought by five visitors who claim they each were duped into paying the $25 entrance fee when, in fact, the fee is supposed to be voluntary.
The ex-employee, who worked at the Fifth Avenue institution from 2007 to 2011 overseeing cashiers and security, requested anonymity because he is job-hunting.
He insists he is not a disgruntled staffer, but came forward because he thinks management is too focused on stuffing its coffers.
“Their attitude toward the public is the public is a cash cow,” he claimed.
Ticket takers “are trained and instructed to pressure and embarrass visitors into paying the stated admission fee,” which is up to $25 per head, the Manhattan Supreme Court suits charge.
The whistleblower, who holds degrees from Yale and Fordham, alleges that one of his bosses told him to shred documents about enforcing fees.
“It’s the most for-profit nonprofit I’ve ever seen in my life,” he insisted.
The Met faces a potential $40 million payout if it loses the suits, which seek compensation for members and visitors who paid with a credit card in the past few years.
Museum spokesman Harold Holzer denied the accusations.
“The predicate of the lawsuit is the museum is supposed to be open for free — that’s not the case,” Holzer said.
He declined to provide a copy of the agreement with the city that dictates fee policies in exchange for generous subsidies and free rent at the Central Park site.
The museum, with more than 6 million visitors annually, “was started as a public institution to bring art to the masses,” attorney Michael Hiller said.
“What it has become is an elite tourist attraction that is really counter to its original purpose.”


Read More:

Met threatens, shames visitors who don't pay voluntary admission fees: former supervisor
New York  Post - March 18, 2013 - By Julia Marsh

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Food Vendors Arrested In Front Of Metropolitan Museum Of Art

Two carts belonging to military vendors that were confiscated by the police on Tuesday in front of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Two carts belonging to military veterans who have set up shot in front of the Metropolitan Museum of Art were confiscated by the police and carted away by the Parks Department on Tuesday. (Photo: Corey Kilgannon/The New York Times)

Manhattan

In the continuing battles over who gets to sell hot dogs in front of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the city cracked down on Tuesday on two military veterans who have each operated pushcarts in front of the museum despite city orders to stop, according to the New York Times.

The vendors, Armando Crescenzi and Howard Dalton, who each served in the Army, were arrested in front of the museum and had the hot dog carts they were operating seized on Tuesday afternoon, after they refused police orders to move.

The two vendors have stirred up controversy by claiming they have a legal right to sell in front of the museum. For the past several months, they have received summonses nearly every day from the Parks Department for vending in a prohibited location.

They cite a 19th-century state law that allows disabled veterans to sell in some areas of the city where other vendors must pay to occupy.

“I don’t care if they arrest me every day — I served this country and under New York State law, I have a legal right to operate a cart here,” Mr. Crescenzi said, before being arrested. “We have lawyers and we’re going to fight this and set a precedent for other veterans, so the city can no longer take away their right to sell.”

Mr. Dalton said, “This law was created so the men and women who serve this country can come home and find a job — what message is the city sending by arresting us?”

Dan Rossi, another military veteran who sells hot dogs in front of the museum on Tuesday, was not arrested and he was not sympathetic. The spot that Mr. Rossi has claimed for years — directly in front of the museum steps — has been set aside by the city for a military veteran vendor.

“As illegal food vendors, those two guys got what they deserved,” Mr. Rossi said after watching the pair get arrested, and as police officers and Parks Department Enforcement officers loaded the two carts onto a Parks Department truck, which removed them to the police precinct station in Central Park, where the two arrested vendors were also taken.

A police spokesman said the two vendors were arrested for violating Parks Department regulations and the provisions of veterans’ vendor licenses.

The museum is one of the most lucrative spots to operate a food cart in the city, and the city’s frustration with veterans’ crowding the spot has been prolonged. The exact legality is complex and sometimes unclear.

Before they were arrested, Mr. Crescenzi and Mr. Dalton insisted they would continue to return to the location with their pushcharts and sue the city to recognize their legal right as veterans to sell at the location.


Read More:

New York Times - November 1, 2011 - By Corey Kilgannon

Hot-dog war no museum peace
New York Post - November 2, 2011 - By Rebecca Rosenberg


A Walk In The Park - November 25, 2009

A Walk In The Park - November 25, 2009




Monday, October 10, 2011

Cupcake Rent Strike In Park $ Consession War Over City Enforcement Inaction

EATEN ALIVE: The owner of the Cake & Shake says business has plummeted since illegal vendors encroached on his territory outside the Met.
EATEN ALIVE: Derek Hunt, co-owner of the Cake & Shake of Long Island City, Queens says business has plummeted since illegal vendors have been allowed to encroach on his territory outside the coveted spot by the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Critics say Illegal vendors including rent-a-vet's have taken over the area because the City, including the Department Of Consumer Affairs have refused to enforce existing laws.

As a result the owners of the cupcake cart have refused to pay the $9,900 monthly payments due to the Parks Department. Hunt said he quickly lost 40 percent of his business, so he quit paying his franchise fees in August. Hunt said that when he won his contract for the space owned by the Parks Department, valued at $659,000 over five years, he was told only one veteran would be permitted to join him and a pretzel cart at the location. (Photo: Andrew Kelly)

Before it opened Cake & Shake co-owner, Gina Ojile didn't think it was going to be an issue. “I don’t think there will be animosity with the hot dog vendors, because we’re offering a different product,” she said. That was before the City misrepresented the situation by routinely allowing eight venders or more to work in the area.
The Parks Department's revenue division has been coming under increasing scrutiny. - Geoffrey Croft

Manhattan

A gourmet cupcake vendor is refusing to pay his rent to the city for a coveted spot outside the Metropolitan Museum of Art because he’s in a battle with “rent-a-vets” trying to steal away his business, according to the New York Post.


Derek Hunt’s Cake & Shake cupcake cart is one of two food vendors who paid the Parks Department for the right to sell snacks on Fifth Avenue in front of the museum.


But Hunt is furious that since he won the contract -- which calls for $9,900 monthly payments to the city -- a year ago, his customers have been winnowed away by competitors who show up with hot-dog carts and don’t pay the city a dime -- and the city, he says, has done nothing to stop them.


“If nothing’s done, I’ll be out of business by the end of October,” said a distraught Hunt.


The competitor carts claim a legal right to be there because they’re run by disabled veterans who have a special privilege to vend on public streets in the city under a decades-old law.


Hunt said that when he won his contract for the space owned by the Parks Department, valued at $659,000 over five years, he was told only one veteran would be permitted to join him and a pretzel cart at the location.


But in August, two or three more carts showed up -- claiming to be run by veterans, too, grabbing a share of the business without having to pay any rent to the city.


“We need a lot of help. It’s a big problem,” said a woman named Rosie, who works for the Sigmund Pretzel Cart, which also pays the city.


“They won’t do anything -- the cops, the city,” fumed Dan Rossi, the lone veteran who was approved to sell hot dogs outside the Met.


Hunt said he quickly lost 40 percent of his business, so he quit paying his franchise fees in August.


What really irks Hunt is that one of his unauthorized competitors is purportedly a former Parks Department franchisee who gave up a six-figure contract and now “rents a vet” to avoid paying the city.


The vets sit beside the cart to make it supposedly legitimate, while other workers peddle the food and drinks.


Parks officials said they’re well aware of the problem and are working with the NYPD -- which hands out summonses virtually every day -- to determine “if additional enforcement measures can be taken.”


Hunt is eager to keep selling his $3 organic cupcakes and $5 shakes, but he’s asking Parks officials for a reduced franchise fee until the illegals are booted.


“I said if you can’t get the guys out of here, we need to renegotiate the contract,” he said. “They said no renegotiating.”


Read More:

New York Post - October 9, 2011 - By Rebecca Rosenberg and David Seifman

A Walk In The Park - November 25, 2009

A Walk In The Park - November 25, 2009