Showing posts with label Phil Abramson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Phil Abramson. Show all posts

Friday, July 29, 2011

City Losing $ 30 Mil Annually On Yankee/Shea Bloomberg Deal

(Photos by Mark Bonifacio/NY Daily News
Besides taking away more than 25 acres of historic parkland in the Bronx - the city is also losing more than $ 30 million a year in revenues under a deal negotiated by the Bloomberg administration. This while the City is planning to layoff 450 park workers in September.

Zero Accountably:

"The loss of revenue from Yankee and Shea Stadiums has no direct impact on the Parks Department's budget as the revenue was directed to the city's general fund and does not affect the agency's operations," Parks Department spokesman Phil Abramson said.

This directly contradicts public statements made by Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe who has repeatedly claimed cuts demanded by Bloomberg have been offset by park revenue gains.

The Daily News further points out the absurdity of this statement by noting that Bloomberg's planned budget reductions for the Parks Department this year specifically said that any increase in recreation fees to the public would help prevent layoffs and other drastic cuts.
– Geoffrey Croft

City-Wide

If you want to know why more than 450 city park workers are about to be laid off or why the Parks Department has imposed outrageous fee increases, just take a look at the new Mets and Yankees ballparks (above).

Deals the Bloomberg administration negotiated in 2006 have stripped some $30 million in annual revenue the Parks Department once generated from Shea Stadium and the old Yankee Stadium, according to the New York Daily News.

This is not something City Hall wants you to know. Parks officials only confirmed the revenue loss after the Daily News asked why budget documents showed a dramatic drop in the agency's franchise income since 2008.

At first glance, that would seem impossible.

Everyone knows private money-making operations have exploded in our parks under Bloomberg. Fancy new restaurants, food kiosks, green grocers, bike rental and private sporting concessions - you name it.

So how could total income from all this business activity be falling?

Well, it turns out that Shea and the old Yankee Stadium - both of which sat on park land, and were owned by the city - were the Parks Department's biggest revenue generators.

Under the old Yankee Stadium deal, the city was assured a percentage of gate receipts, a percentage of food sales, even a percentage of the team's cable revenue.

Because of that, the old stadium produced as much as $15 million a year for Parks - even after deducting costs for stadium upkeep.

Likewise, the Shea Stadium deal generated as much as $9 million annually for the city.

As recently as 2008, the two ballparks represented nearly half of the $51 million in concessions revenue generated by the entire Parks system.

On top of that, the city was taking in an additional $6 million annually from parking fees at Shea and the old Yankee Stadium.

Once the new ballparks opened, all that revenue disappeared - even the parking money.

Today, the Mets keep all their parking revenue. Meanwhile, the Yankee Stadium garages, run by an independent firm, are nearly bankrupt and may never produce the $3 million annually they agreed to provide the city.

This loss of $30 million each and every year is a hidden cost to taxpayers from the new ballparks.

Parks officials insist there's no real problem.

"The loss of revenue from Yankee and Shea Stadiums has no direct impact on the Parks Department's budget as the revenue was directed to the city's general fund and does not affect the agency's operations," spokesman Phil Abramson said.

That is pure nonsense. Bloomberg's planned budget reductions for the Parks Department this year specifically said that any increase in fees to the public would help prevent layoffs and other drastic cuts.

The result was a doubling of fees for tennis permits - from $100 to $200. Adult memberships to recreation centers went from $50 to $100, and from $75 to $150 if the center has a pool.

Even fees for adult leagues to use ballfields increased by 60%.

In other words, the Mets and Yankees save millions and the rest of us make it up with huge fee hikes.

"The elected officials who voted for this welfare for rich professional teams should be ashamed of themselves," said Geoffrey Croft, director of New York City Park Advocates.


Read More:

New York Daily News - July 29, 2011 - By Juan Gonzalez

Monday, December 6, 2010

Design Firm Offers Up Vision For Union Square's Children's Pavilion - Without Kids

2010_12_union2.jpg

Interior. Children's Pavilion? BNOdesign envisions the space not as what's needed in the communty but instead as another restaurant. All that time and energy put into these designs makes one wonder what delights the firm could have come up with if they put their efforts into creating a design that served the community instead. Despite strong community opposition, the Union Square Partnership and the City are attempting to install a seasonal restaurant in the historic pavilion.

Performers in the pavilion, sponsored by the Union Square Community Coalition - early 1980's.


On its website, design Firm BNO asks if you've ever wondered what's going to happen with that wonderful classic building on the north end of Union Square Park in New York City? BNOdesign came up with what they describe as a "romantic, yet informal, restaurant idea for the space. Not only will it compliment the local neighborhood, it will also create an elegant dining experience in the middle of the park."

Apparently the firm is unaware or doesn't care that the community is dead set against using the Children's Pavilion for a restaurant. As is widely known, the community wants the pavilion renovated and restored to its former use as a sheltered, indoor recreation center that serves a variety of year-round recreation and free public uses. The area around Union Square Park has the lowest amount of playground space and the Highest concentration of restaurants in the entire city. In CB 5 there are only two playgrounds but there are more than 150 eating establishments, bars and markets within just a two block radius of the park. The pavilion and adjacent playgrounds have played an important role in the lives of countless children. For more than 130 years, the park‘s pavilions have served many functions - a playspace for children, a bandstand, a reviewing stand, a speakers’ rostrum, and as a focal point for labor rallies and social protests.

Unlike Manhattan's other pavilion in Columbus Park which was handsomely restored and given back to the neighborhood for community activities the anonymous donor and a BID are being allowed to dictate public land use policies. They have spent millions of dollars attempting to take away and privatize much needed public space from the community.

BNOdesign says that their project design, "is solely conceptual and is not in any way related to current decisions for the Union Square space."

The pavillion Is being rehabilitated by the architecture firm Architecture Research Office (ARO). According to a Nov. 6, 2006 agreement with the Parks Dept, the architecture firm ARO has billed $566, 680, and expects $677, 103 more, as January 2007.

According to ARO principal Stephen Cassell, the firm expanded the basement level to make offices for parks employees and relocate the restaurant's kitchens below ground. The restaurant design however has never been released.

Parks Department spokesman Philip Abramson was apparently confused recently when he explained why or how the playground was expanded. "By relocating a concession to the pavilion, Mr. Abramson told Washington Square News, "we were able to triple the size of the outdoor play area." What he didn't mention was that the original plan moved the restaurant into the pavilion but expanded playground space in the park by just 14%. Due to intense community pressure the Bloomberg administration finally bowed and not only changed the plan from a year -round to a seasonal restaurant, but an inappropriate outdoor concession terrace and poor design which put users into a pit - was also changed. This decision finally freed up the entire space in front of the pavilion and enabled the playground to be expanded.

Another issue is the City's intent of limiting demonstrations and events in the North End of the park: Due to its configuration and size the north end of the park has historically accommodated large gatherings of people for many reasons including protests demonstrations and rallies. The BID and City's plan is also expected to impede on the parks' historic first amendment and free space role in the Northern Plaza as the City will be less inclined to issue permits for large gatherings in order to protect the commercial interests of the restaurant. It is this important role which served as one of the main reasons why the park was designated a National Historic Landmark in 1997. The city has attempted to all shift demonstrations to the South side of the park which is not ideal for a number of reasons.

The Parks Department closed the RFP responses in August 2010 but has not yet announced who they are awarding the concession to. Danny Meyer has promised he will not seek to benefit from the restaurant, however Union Square Partnership (BID) Secretary Eric Petterson, from the Gotham City Restaurant Group, has not publicly recused himself from bidding on the project. Mr. Petterson ran the Luna Cafe which occupied the sunken terrace in front of the pavilion for twelve years.
– Geoffrey Croft

2010_12_union1.jpg
Exterior. Pavilion - Looking South. This is how BNOdesign envisions the design and usage of the historic pavilion.

Union Square - North End. October 2, 2002. Thousands attend a free concert in honor of the late John Lennon.
Union Square - North End. The city has attempted to all shift demonstrations and major events to the south side of the park which is not ideal for a number of reasons.

Playground equipment in the sunken terrace, circa 1985. The BID and the City have tried to claim this area as new playground space when in fact they are restoring what was taken away by the seasonal Luna cafe for twelve years.

Read More:

Washington Square News - December 8, 2010 - by Jaewon Kang

Here's What the Controversial Union Sq. Restaurant Might Look Like

Curbed - December 3, 2010 - by Joey Arak