





Parks Department Chief Engineer John Natol seen here with Queens Parks Commissioner Dorothy Lewandowski inspecting the repairs being made to the boardwalk last week near Beach 101st St. in Rockaway Beach. (Photo: Anthony Delmundo/for the New York Daily News)


The concrete section of the Riegelmann Boardwalk in Brighton Beach is already cracking despite being open for only a few months. This is just one of the issues locals wanted to avoid. In a "pilot" program the Parks Department has replaced sections of the historic boardwalk in Coney Island and Brighton Beach with concrete instead of with traditional wood or with a sustainable material. The City refuses to allocate proper funds to maintain the wooden boardwalk. On March 21, CB 13 voted against the proposal.
Brooklyn
THE COMMUTE: This week’s Commute is for those of you who walk or run on the Riegelmann Boardwalk, which is in danger of extinction as we know it. The latest proposal calls for a 12-foot wide concrete strip for motorized vehicles, yielding to opposition from those who opposed a boardwalk entirely made of concrete. Now here is the latest development, according to Sheepsheadbites.
The new concrete boardwalk, laid last year, has already developed numerous hairline cracks after only one winter. The 300-foot segment between Ocean Parkway and Brighton 1st Road is already showing signs of age, although the city favored concrete over choices such as natural wood,kebony-treated wood and recycled plastic lumber. Also, the concrete is staining and shows off gum spots remarkably well.
The City Lies
This all flies in the face of the city’s claims that concrete was the most sturdy and economical choice and would last virtually forever, something they suggested on multiple occasions.
“Concrete is less expensive to use, can last decades rather than up to 10 years, and requires virtually no maintenance,” Parks Spokesperson Meghan Lalor said last fall. “It is significantly more effective than the other choices.”
Brooklyn Parks Commissioner Kevin Jeffrey said the material costs less, is not slippery, is easier to repair and is less likely to break or rot than its alternatives. There was no mention as to how snow would be removed or if the concrete walk would be salted or plowed and how much wear and tear that would cause.
In actuality, the wood in use now was guaranteed for 20 years with some sections lasting as few as 12 years – not 10 as the city asserted. The problem with wood, however, is that much of it came from tropical rain forests, justifiably sparking opposition from environmentalists. But the city’s opposition to other materials seems a little less substantial.
The makers of Recycled Plastic Lumber claim it can last as long as 50 years, but the city says the material is too slippery when wet. I walked on the small section installed along Steeplechase Pier and can tell you it is also slippery even when dry. Apparently the original wood grain texture giving it some traction has already worn away leaving an ultra-smooth surface. Also, I do not understand why the slats were installed with no space between for the water to drain. But, overall, these are issues that can be remedied with minor design tweaks.
Recently two groups have sprouted to preserve the Riegelmann Boardwalk: Todd Dobrin’s Friends of the Boardwalk, and Rob Burstein’s Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance, which is circulating an online petition.
What Should Be Done?
Concrete apparently is not as durable as the city claimed it would be because the hairline cracks will only get worse with age and eventually will have to patched – unless, of course, the city wants to be faced with huge lawsuits, since falls on concrete are much more severe than falls on wood. Concrete is also criticized because it is more difficult to walk or run on than wood and that it is hotter than wood to walk on with bare feet. I am in favor of the recycled plastic lumber as long as a variety can be found that will not become slippery after only a few years, and if it could be installed to look like the traditional boardwalk. I do not believe we should have to destroy the rain forest to obtain a lumber that is usable for the boardwalk. Other varieties such as kebony-treated lumber should be considered. However, the makers of kebony have not come forth to show that pricing is economically feasible as they have alleged.
What I Think Will Happen
A small section composed of recycled plastic lumber with a concrete driving strip will be constructed. The city will not acknowledge the fact that concrete is not holding up as intended, but will state after a year that recycled plastic lumber is too slippery and not suitable for further use, and will revert to their original plan to complete the remainder of the boardwalk (except for five blocks within the amusement area which they may increase to 10) entirely of concrete. They will buy the cheapest grade of recycled plastic lumber on the market to ensure that it fails, and will make no attempt to find a type that will not get slippery or wear out too fast. They also will do no investigation of using non-tropical woods or kebony (or similarly treated) wood.
Related posts

Concrete-hating Community Board 13 has rejected the Parks Department’s latest proposal to keep a cement path along the Riegelmann Boardwalk, but cover some of the iconic waterfront walkway with recycled plastic lumber, according to the Brooklyn Paper.
The board voted on March 21 against the proposal, which is an alternative to the agency’s original plan to convert the entire three-mile stretch into cement. Most locals say that making a third of the Boardwalk concrete would still turn the iconic wooden walkway into a highway.
“We don’t want any concrete!” said Robert Burstein, a member of the board and founder of the Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance, a boardwalk advocacy group. “They are prioritizing vehicles over people.”
The city says it will present a new plan to the board next month, according to spokesman Philip Abramson, but it will still insist on installing the less-expensive cement, which he says is strong enough for the police cars patrolling the area and trucks that use it to make deliveries.
But locals say that recycled plastic lumber, which, at the very least, resembles the famous wooden planks, could easily withstand the weight of vehicles.
“It’s unacceptable and unnecessary when there are alternative materials the city could use,” Burstein said.
In addition to loathing the look of the scored and colored concrete, many fear the material could scorch pedestrians’ feet and may not protect the waterfront from the ocean during a storm.
“People are not going to be able to walk barefoot over that. They’re going to burn their feet,” said Brighton Beach activist Ida Sanoff, who added that “if waves hit a hard concrete surface, it’s energy will not dissipate and there’s an opportunity for great property damage.”
But the city says that cost is the biggest factor when it determines what material should be used
According to the city, concrete costs $90 per square-foot, compared to $114 per square foot for a concrete slab topped with recycled plastic lumber.
“Concrete is less expensive to use, can last decades rather than up to 10 years, and requires virtually no maintenance,” said Meghan Lalor, a spokeswoman for the Parks Department, last fall. “It is significantly more effective than the other choices.”
The Parks Department also disputes residents’ notions that artificial wood is just as durable as concrete. Over the summer, city officials had installed both concrete planks and a “faux-wood” called recycled plastic lumber to test both materials. The agency concluded that the concrete was more durable than the faux wood, and didn’t get slippery.
The city hasn’t announced when the concrete boardwalk will be installed.
Read More:
Concrete jungle! Panel rejects city’s latest plan for cement boardwalk
Critics Reject Parks Dept. Coney/Brighton Beach Concrete Boardwalk Spin
A Walk In The Park - November 10, 2010
Coney/Brighton Beach Boardwalk To Sidewalk Uproar
A Walk In The Park - October 29, 2010