Friday, March 5, 2010

Tree Care Questioned

CBS
A 46-year-old man from Brooklyn was killed on Feb. 25, 2010, after being struck by a fallen tree limb in Central Park
.


After a Brooklyn man was killed by a branch that fell in Central Park last week, a watchdog group said the city doesn’t do enough to maintain trees in parks, according to Our Town.

Elmaz Qyra, 46, was walking along Central Park’s Literary Walk Feb. 25, during one of the largest snowfalls on record, when he was struck and killed by a falling live tree branch, police said. He was pronounced dead by EMS at 3:25 p.m. Later that night, the Parks Department took a rare step in advising New Yorkers to avoid city parks.

Geoffrey Croft, president of New York City Park Advocates, a non-profit that tracks city park policy, said the warning was an “amazing indictment” of the state of the city’s park trees.

“I was floored when I heard about [the advisory],” he said. “I’ve never heard of anything like this before.”

Croft believes that a funding shortfall for tree maintenance could result in more accidents.

Inwood Hill Park - February 28, 2010. Freshly downed tree branch, one of dozens in the Upper Manhattan Park after the snow fall. Photo: © Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates.

Read More:

TREE CARE QUESTIONED

Our Town - March 4, 2010 - By Samuel Chamberlain

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Albany Rally Today Over Proposed State Parks Cuts

Adv Day Header
Parks & Trails New York

ALBANY, N.Y. – A rally is planned in Albany by New Yorkers protesting Paterson administration plans to close dozens of state parks and historic sites.

The advocacy group Parks & Trails New York says Wednesday's rally will be held outside the Capitol at noon.

The state parks office has said it will close 41 of 178 parks and reduce services at 23 others and shut down 14 of 35 historic sites because of New York's budget crisis.

Gov. David Paterson's budget proposal for fiscal 2010-2011 cuts $20 million from the parks agency.

Earlier this week, parks officials said they had canceled hundreds of campsite reservations at 12 state parks that could be closed this year.

Advocates say closing parks will reduce state revenues and hurt local economies.

Associated Press - March 3, 2010


visit us online

Legislators need to hear from you today!
.
Here are two things you can do:
  • Come to a rally at noon in Albany
  • Call or email your legislators
If we all act, we can win the battle to keep parks open. Imagine if legislators heard from only a fraction of the 56 million park users!
.
Save Our State Park Rally
12:00 Noon
West Capitol Park, Swan Street Steps
.
If you can't come to Albany, you can still make a big difference.
Call or email your Assemblyperson and State Senator
It will only take a few minutes but it will make a huge impact.
THE BOTTOM LINE MESSAGE: Restore $11 million to the State Parks budget to prevent park closings!
.
Please speak out for of parks today!
.
For more information 518-434-1583,
ptny@ptny.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Contact:
Damaris Olivo | (212) 828-5829 | dolivo.nys@gmail.com
Gregory Meyer | (518) 455-2795 | gregorygmeyer@gmail.com

**MEDIA ADVISORY**

***THIS EVENT IS NOW TAKING PLACE IN THE LOBBY OF THE SENATE CHAMBER, ON THE 3RD FLOOR OF THE CAPITOL BUILDING***

SENATOR SERRANO AND ASSEMBLYMAN ENGLEBRIGHT FIGHT AGAINST CUTS TO STATE PARKS

(Albany, NY)- Senator José M. Serrano (D-Manhattan/Bronx), Assemblyman Steve Englebright (D- Setauket), their colleagues, and concerned organizations and environmental advocates will meet with the press to discuss the devastating cuts to State Parks in Governor David A. Paterson's Executive Budget proposal.

The proposed cuts would lead to the closing of 91 State Parks- the first park closures in the 185 year history of the State Park system.These cuts will be detrimental to thousands of New Yorkers by eliminating jobs, recreational activities, educational activities, and community programs that raise the quality of life of all New Yorkers.


WHO:

-Senator José M. Serrano (Chairman, Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation)
-Assemblyman Steve Englebright (Chairman, Tourism, Parks, Arts, and Sports Development)
-Senator Brian Foley
-Senator Roy J. McDonald
-Senator George Onorato
-Senator Eric T. Schneiderman
-Senator David J. Valesky

- Parks and Trails New York
- Audubon New York

WHEN:
March 3, 2010, 11:00 AM

WHERE:
Lobby of Senate Chamber
Capitol Building, 3rd Floor
Albany, NY

###
Senator José M. Serrano Represents the 28th Senatorial District, which includes East Harlem, Roosevelt Island, and parts of Yorkville and the South Bronx. He serves as Secretary of the Majority Conference, and is the Chair of the Senate Committee on Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation.

UPDATE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

March 3, 2010

Contact:
Damaris Olivo | (212) 828-5829 | dolivo.nys@gmail.com


SERRANO, ENGLEBRIGHT, COLLEAGUES, AND ADVOCATES CALL ON GOVERNOR PATERSON TO RESTORE FUNDING FOR STATE PARKS AND HISTORIC SITES

Senator José M. Serrano (D-Manhattan/Bronx) and Assemblyman Steve Englebright (D- Setauket), Chairmen of the Assembly and Senate Committees overseeing State Parks, convened a bipartisan press conference on Wednesday to discuss the devastating cuts to Parks in Governor David A. Paterson's proposed Executive Budget for FY 2010-11. Alongside colleagues and Parks advocates from across the state, they called on the Governor to restore a minimum of $11.3 million in operating aid for State Parks to the final state budget in order to prevent unprecedented park closures.

91 State Parks and 14 historic sites would be forced to close, and service reductions and cutbacks in programming would affect 40 sites.

"Appropriate funding for State Parks is important to both the economy and character of New York," said Senator Serrano, who serves as Chair of the Senate Committee on Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks, and Recreation. "In the current economic climate, demand for parks is at an all-time high, and we cannot stand by as New Yorkers face losing the quality recreational environment on which they have come to depend."

"We find ourselves amidst the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, during which Governor Franklin Roosevelt increased the size of the State Park system, seeing its potential as an economic catalyst," said Serrano. "We must make fiscally responsible budgeting decisions in order to create jobs and maintain the vital programs and services that New Yorkers have come to rely on. The people of New York State deserve more than typical Albany quick-fixes for the current fiscal environment."

The Governor's Executive Budget Proposal included $20 million in General Fund cuts to the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation's (OPRHP) operating budget, which was partially offset by a restoration of $3.9 million in his 21-Day Amendments. However, this additional funding would not prevent the first park closures in the history of the State Park system.

Serrano, who distributed a sign-on letter addressed to legislative leadership to all members of the New York State Senate, has garnered bipartisan support in favor of restoring funds for State Parks. The sign on letter requests $20 million in aid for State Parks. Since the letter was drafted, additional funding has been restored and the endangered State Parks would be able to remain open with an additional $11.3 million.

"The proposed Executive budget outlines cuts that will damage forever the people's immensely important parks and historic sites," said Assemblyman Englebright. "We know parks and historic sites to be economic generators for our tourism industry, but they are much more. They are institutions of optimism in a time of fear and uncertainty. It is imperative that we, as stewards of the people's assets, protect and preserve these public recreational, cultural, and economic treasures, during a time when they are needed most."

Over the past two years, the budget for State Parks has been cut by $46 million dollars, equating to 25% of the agency's operating budget. This has resulted in service reductions at 100 State Parks and historic sites, and the elimination of 1,000 jobs.

According to a study done by the University of Massachusetts at Amherst's Political Economy Research Institute, New York State's park system generates $5 of economic activity for every $1 of state money invested, resulting in millions of dollars in tax revenue statewide.

"Cuts to Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation will also cut jobs for thousands of New Yorkers," Senator Neil D. Breslin (D-Albany) said. "Cultural and recreational establishments are vital to our tourism industry which generates a significant amount of revenue for our state. Cutting these programs could do more harm than good to our economy."

"The parks belong to the people. To take them away during this economic recession, when more and more families are seeking affordable recreation close to home is simply unacceptable," said Senator Brian Foley (D-Blue Point). "State parks constitute one quarter of one percent of the entire state budget. Closing them is not the answer to New York State's fiscal troubles. As an advocate for our parks, I have been proud to lead efforts to defeat the governor's proposal to close our parks. We must continue to stand up for children and families in our state and fight to keep our parks open."

"The economic importance of these parks and historic sites have been grossly underestimated. Within our region, the park system provides a wonderful economic engine throughout the year for vacations and local daytrips - the Capital Region is rich with opportunities for outdoor activities due to our outstanding park system. Most importantly, New York State Parks give the average, working-class family an affordable entertainment opportunity right in their own backyard. In a state where there are very few venues for hard working men and women to see their tax dollars utilized effectively, the State Park System is truly an everyday example of tax dollars working for the taxpayer. To close parks in Rensselaer and Saratoga County along with anywhere in the Capital Region would be an outrage," said Senator Roy McDonald (R-Saratoga).

"There is no question that we are facing tremendous fiscal challenges in New York State, but there is also no question that our parks, museums and arts and cultural organizations provide jobs and contribute enormously to our overall economy," said Senator George Onorato (D-Queens). "From one end of our state to the other, many New York families depend on these wonderful institutions for recreation, education and cultural enrichment, and they are well deserving of our support."

"These proposed cuts are penny wise and pound foolish. There is no doubt we are facing the worst economic crisis in generations, but closing parks, shuttering historic sites and slashing cultural programs will only compound the problem. New York's parks and cultural institutions are the best in the world, and we cannot afford to lose the good jobs, tourism dollars and convenient recreation these attractions provide," said Senator Eric T. Schneiderman (D-Manhattan/Bronx).

"Closing treasured state parks and cutting the jobs of the hardworking people who staff them would be a serious error in my opinion," said Senator William T. Stachowski (D-Lake View). "The parks positively impact local economies. The long term costs of lost jobs and lost local revenues to area businesses and in local tourism dollars far exceed any short term savings typically gained by reducing staffing and access to state parks. In addition, as much as this is a financial issue, it's also a quality of life issue. State parks are invaluable cultural, historic and recreational resources. I believe we can find other ways to save money and spare our local parks from closure and will continue to fight for their funding as we move into this final stage of budget negotiations."

The lawmakers were joined by parks advocates from across the state, including Parks and Trails New York and Audubon New York.

###

Senator José M. Serrano Represents the 28th Senatorial District, which includes East Harlem, Roosevelt Island, and parts of Yorkville and the South Bronx. He serves as Secretary of the Majority Conference, and is the Chair of the Senate Committee on Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation.

Freshkills Park Tours


The former Fresh Kills landfill looks very different today than it did a decade ago. (SI Advance file photo/Irving Silverstein)

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. – From garbage dump to picturesque, recreational hub.

City planners have bold plans for Fresh Kills, labeled "one of the great regional parks of the 21st century."

Have trouble seeing that grand vision? Then set aside 90 minutes to see for yourself.

The Parks Department is again opening up the 2,200-acre West Shore site for guided tours between April and November, led by Urban Park Rangers and Freshkills Park staff, according to an Article in The Staten Island Advance.

Freshkills Park, located on Staten Island's West Shore, is opening its gates this spring for guided tours. The site, once the world's biggest landfill, is being transformed into one of the next great regional parks of the 21st century. Tours are available from April through November and are led by the Urban Park Rangers and a member of the Freshkills Park staff.

The largest park developed in New York City in more than 100 years, Freshkills Park will provide a wide range of recreational opportunities, ecological restoration and cultural and educational programming that promote environmental sustainability, and a renewed public concern for the human impact on the earth.

Tour guides will discuss the site's history, engineering and landscape design, including the abundant flora and fauna that are returning to the area. The tour will take visitors to the tops of two of the site's four large landfill mounds, offering expansive views of the site and views of downtown Manhattan and all four Staten Island bridges.

NYC Parks & Recreation rendering of Freshkills Park on Staten Island Park when completed.

Read More:

Gothamist - March 2, 2010 - By John Del Signore

Rockaway Beach Erosion Restoration Under-Funded

Rockaway beaches are facing rocky times, as inadequate funding could affect the areas most severely hit by recent storms, according to the Queens Courier.

According to Queens Parks Commissioner Dorothy Lewandowski, the East Rockaway Inlet is dredged every two years to make it more accessible for boats. The sand is then deposited on the peninsula’s beaches, from Beach 26th and Beach 38th Streets. However, due to the recent Nor’easters beginning last November, there was a need for sand between Beach 80th and 110th Streets.

“This past year we lost a lot of sand in higher numbers like the 90s to lower 100s, so we reached out to the Army Corps [of Engineers] and asked them to consider putting it [the sand] there rather than in the 30s, which didn’t really lose sand,” Lewandowski said.

Read More:

The Queens Courier -  March 2, 2010 - BY ALEXA MAE ASPERIN

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Gowanus Canal Receives EPA Superfund Designation - Blow To Bloomberg Administration


Trash and raw sewage overflow into the canal when the city's sewer system is overwhelmed by heavy precipitation. Photo: Damon Winter/The New York Times

BROOKLYN

The Environmental Protection Agency designated the Gowanus Canalin Brooklyn a Superfund site on Tuesday and announced plans to clean up more than a century’s worth of noxious pollutants there, according to the New York Times.

The decision ended a contentious debate and was a blow to the Bloomberg administration, which had proposed a cleanup without such a designation. The city had argued that the label could set off legal battles with polluters, prolong the dredging operation and spook developers leery of the stigma of a Superfund listing.

But in a conference call with reporters, Judith A. Enck, the E.P.A. administrator for the region, said the Superfund designation would guarantee the best result for residents and the environment and ensure that the polluters cover all the costs.

“We believe that it would get us the most efficient and comprehensive cleanup,” Ms. Enck said.

From Gowanus Bay to New York Harbor, the agency has found contamination along the entire length of the clouded 1.8-mile canal in a preliminary assessment, including pesticides, metals and the cancer-causing chemicals known as PCBs.

The agency estimates that the project will last 10 to 12 years and cost $300 million to $500 million. The city estimated that its approach would take nine years.

Read More:
Gowanus Canal Gets Superfund Status
New York Times - March 2, 2010 -  By Mireya Navarro


Gowanus Canal
Photo credit: Josh Verleun

The federal Environmental Protection Agency put the Gowanus Canal on its list of Superfund sites on Tuesday. The 1.8-mile canal in the midst of Brooklyn has been contaminated by heavy industry over the last century. Now the feds are stepping in for the big clean-up. The decision is controversial and will have many repercussions according to The Brooklyn Ink.

Lenore Cho and Sudip Mukherjee delved into the discussion and found out who is for the Superfund declaration and who is against it and what their reasons are.

Pro Superfund:

Clean water activists, community groups and local politicians rejoiced about the declaration, which will likely require extensive clean-up over the next dozen years.

Riverkeeper, a New York watchdog group that studies polluted waterways, has long been an advocate of federal intervention at the canal. Josh Verleun, the group’s attorney and chief investigator, said the Superfund label is extremely helpful because it requires chief polluters named by the E.P.A. to pay for the cleanup activities.

“The E.P.A. can bring these companies to the table and make them financially responsible for their contaminants,” Verleun said. “The Gowanus Canal is a very contaminated site, in need of a complex, expensive remediation. Forcing big-time polluters to pay for their mistakes lightens the burden on federal funding.”

Verleun also worked with various neighborhood groups that strongly supported the idea of Superfund status for the canal, and said 85 percent of the respondents to the E.P.A.’s survey of residents living nearby said they approved of the idea.

One local group, called the Urban Divers Estuary Conservancy, works to promote community knowledge of, and participation in, the maintenance of the city’s coastal waters. For years, the group has worked with interested residents and area college professors to study the canal, including ways to clean up all the toxic pollution.

“We are very happy with the outcome and think the Superfund (designation) is the beginning of a pathway that leads to a cleaner, better Gowanus Canal,” said Ludger Balan, executive and environmental program director of the Urban Divers.

According to Balan, the waters in the canal are so contaminated that the bulkhead and land surrounding the canal are becoming eroded. Additionally, because of excess water and sewage pooled in the canal, there is more harmful bacterial content in the Gowanus than in any other body in New York City. “The Superfund will bring real efforts to controlling a dangerous problem in Brooklyn,” he said.

Read More:

The Brooklyn Ink - March 2, 2010 - By Lenore Cho and Sudip P. Mukherjee 


Press Release - March 2, 2010 

CONTACT:

Tina Posterli, Riverkeeper, 914-478-4501 x 239

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Tarrytown, NY – March 2, 2010 – Riverkeeper, New York’s leading clean water advocate, today commended the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to list Brooklyn’s toxic Gowanus Canal on the Superfund National Priorities List. The decision to list the canal will begin a comprehensive effort by the federal EPA to remove 150 years of contamination from the Canal’s murky bottom and to address sites along the Canal’s banks that continue to leach pollution into the waterway.

“After 150 years of abuse and neglect the Gowanus Canal will finally get the comprehensive cleanup that the residents of the area deserve,” stated Josh Verleun, Riverkeeper Attorney & Chief Investigator.

“The toxic legacy of coal tar, PCBs, pesticides, and other contamination of the Gowanus can only be cleaned through a comprehensive Superfund cleanup; we are gratified to see the EPA stepping up to this task.”

Riverkeeper has been a vocal advocate for a Superfund cleanup for the Gowanus since the EPA announced that it was considering the Canal for the federal Superfund program in April, 2009. After reviewing an alternative Gowanus cleanup plan put forth by New York City and determining that it was inadequate, Riverkeeper filed comments with the EPA in support of Superfund, joined with community groups to rally support for Superfund from EPA and elected officials, and launched a letter writing campaign in support of the designation.

Riverkeeper’s efforts to support Superfund are part of a larger focus on halting ongoing pollution of the Gowanus Canal. In September, 2009 Riverkeeper launched a pollution enforcement initiative on the Canal filing three Notices of Intent to Sue against environmental law breakers and sent a warning to another. Violations included dumping of scrap metal and debris into the canal; discharge of liquid cement and stone aggregate; and illegal operation of an open dump. Riverkeeper has also increased boat patrols and water quality testing of the Canal and has established partnerships with law enforcement and other agencies to combat ongoing pollution.

http://www.riverkeeper.org/news-events/news/riverkeeper-commends-epa-decision-for-comprehensive-superfund-cleanup-of-toxic-gowanus-canal/



Monday, March 1, 2010

Cuts, Layoffs Looming for Parks Department

Cuts to the Parks department being proposed by Mayor Bloomberg would severely affect an already decimated agency. 













CITY- WIDE


The Big Apple's parks are so deep in red ink that city swimming pools are about to run dry, according to the New York Post.


Mayor Bloomberg's $63.6 billion preliminary spending plan for the next fiscal year anticipates the Parks Department's budget dropping by 9.4 percent, to $239.1 million -- resulting in massive layoffs and service cuts, including the closing of some pools.


It's part of across-the-board cuts all city departments face as the mayor tries to close a $4.9 billion budget gap.


By the end of the next fiscal year, the Parks Department's full-time staff could be gutted by 20 percent, from 3,722 to 2,974, according to the city's financial plan for fiscal years 2010-2014.


And this does not include thousands of part-time and seasonal jobs also in danger of being lost, either through hiring freezes or layoffs.


Geoffrey Croft of the watchdog group New York City Park Advocates said the city already lacks enough workers to maintain its 29,000 acres of parkland, and called the cuts "just another slap in the face to the public."


"Taking care of parks simply isn't a priority with this administration," he said.


Kids who rely on city pools to cool off will perhaps be the hardest hit. 


Read More:


New York Post - March 1, 2010 - By Rich Calder


Mayor Bloomberg is proposing allocating a historic low amount of city funds to maintain the operate the Parks Department. Under Bloomberg's $ 63.6 Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2011 the Park Department’s budget from city funds would be reduced from $264 million  - to $239 million. This would represent only a 0.37% allocation of the city budget in city funds to maintain and operate parks which would be a historic low. The agency is responsible for 14% of the City's land. Mr. Bloomberg’s overall proposed budget is $560 million larger than last year.

Severe cuts being proposed under the Mayor's plan include staff and programs:

• The Mayor's forecast for the next year and a half calls for the Parks Department to lose 748 out of 3,722 full-time jobs (20%).  And if you count full-time and full time equivalent head-count they lose 1,156 jobs.

•  450 seasonal jobs delayed or cut this year.

• Four pools will be closed all summer and the swimming season will be shortened by two weeks citywide.  (NYC already ranks dead last in the provision of public swimming pools for a high density city) This would save $1.4 million in FY 2011 according to the mayor. 

• . Eliminate 173 full-time positions either voluntarily or through lay-offs.   The target goal is 173 positions but according to the DPR's budget office "there is no cap."

•  The full-time and seasonal hiring freeze will affect many staffing areas, including the maintenance and operation.  Severe cuts include $ 4.5 million over the next few months for Job Training Participants, (JTP's) and $ 10 million reduction next year. The last number represents s 25% cut in the program.  The federal government puts in fifty percent of the JTP's forty million dollar budget with the city and state splitting the rest.  These positions are essential in providing basic cleaning services during the busiest season for parks.   – NYCPA

The parks budget hearing is March 22.

Supporting Documents:

Harris Field Contamination Known Long Before Recent Construction Began

MONDAY, MARCH 1, 2010

Costly Clean-up Stalls Harris Field Project

[Note: This story first appeared in the print edition of the Norwood News, which hit streets last week. In the story, Geoffrey Croft of New York City Park Advocates says the Parks Dept. should have known about this contamination before they even bid out the contract for renovations, or at least a year ago, maybe even earlier. Now, it appears there were multiple reports of hazardous material contamination at Harris Park prior to 2004, according to a supplemental environmental impact statement completed for a DEP construction project at Jerome Park Reservoir. Thanks to Karen Argenti, a longtime Bronx activist and watchdog, for pointing this out.]

By Alex Kratz

Sonia Lappin looks out over Harris Field from her Bedford Park apartment building and sees a glorious past – a community space used by generations of local families for everything from ball games to picnics – and an uncertain future.

Lappin, a long-time local resident and activist who lives in Scott Tower just across the street from Harris, is not alone. She and others wonder how long the next generation will have to wait before the fields will be ready and safe for use after lead soil contamination was discovered at Harris in 2009.

The contamination was unearthed by construction workers doing a massive renovation of the heavily-used park sometime in 2009 and the fix is going to cost an additional $5.2 million of taxpayer funds, bringing the total cost of the project to $13.9 million. The original cost estimate for the renovation, which was being paid for by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and carried out by the Parks Department, was $6.6 million.

Unanswered questions surrounding the contamination and renovation efforts have infuriated local residents like Lappin.

“Everyone is really upset about the stalling and the cover-up,” Lappin said.

Since the Norwood News broke news of the contamination and how it was stalling the project back in October, the Parks Department has been cautiously tight-lipped about Harris Field, which lies between Lehman College and the Bronx High School of Science near the Jerome Park Reservoir.

It remains unclear when the contamination was discovered, what levels of contamination were found and when the fields will finally be ready for use.

[In October, the Norwood News filed a Freedom of Information Law request asking for all of this information. The Parks Department responded, saying they would need 60 business days to compile the information. It has now been more than 90 days and the Parks Department still has not responded.]

“[The Parks Department] doesn’t seem to be talkative about the future of the field,” said Barbara Stronczer, the head of Community Board 7’s parks committee.

After the contamination story broke, the agency twice sent representatives to the Board’s Parks Committee meetings at Stronczer’s request. They said they didn’t have anything to tell the committee about what was happening at Harris Field.

In January, a Parks Department representative finally told Stronczer’s committee that the agency was taking steps to “cap” the contaminated soil with a layer of synthetic containment lining (called “geo-textile”) and then a foot of fresh, contaminant-free topsoil.

Parks Department spokesperson Jesslyn Moser said in an e-mail, “We added into our plan removal of the contaminated soil and the addition of one foot of clean fill where needed.”

Stronczer said the Parks Department told her committee that work on the field would resume when the weather warmed up, probably sometime in March. They didn’t say when the fields would be ready for play, but said they wouldn’t be ready for this spring or summer.

Unfortunately, that’s when local little leagues count on the use of Harris Field.

Originally, in August of 2008, the Parks Department said construction would be completed by the spring of 2009, in time for little league play.

Mosholu Montefiore Community Center’s little league teams have used Harris for years, but last year, with construction still ongoing, they were forced to play elsewhere and down-size their league from 1,000 kids to around 500.

Geoffrey Croft of the nonprofit group New York City Park Advocates said the problems should have been taken care of long ago.

“Knowing the history of the site the contaminates should have been known about before the job went out to bid,” Croft said. “It's outrageous that the parks department continues to block the release of the contamination results and when they first found out about the hazardous materials. This is a basic public health and safety issue.”

Read More:

Costly Clean-up Stalls Harris Field Project

Norwood News - March 1, 2010 - By Alex Kratz


Harris Field Contamination Debacle Continues

A Walk In The Park - January 19, 2010