Showing posts with label Adolfo Carrión. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adolfo Carrión. Show all posts

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Yankee "Slush Fund" Recipients Questioned

MAKING IT RAIN: Question-able beneficiaries of a community fund created in the deal for the new Yankee Stadium include the formerly for-profit El Maestro gym (pictured) and the apparel seller ALFRBA, run by Barbara Gibson.

MAKING IT RAIN: Question-able beneficiaries of a community fund created in the deal for the new Yankee Stadium include the formerly for-profit El Maestro gym (pictured) and the apparel seller ALFRBA, run by Barbara Gibson - (below) according to the New York Post. The administers of the fund refused to make available the 2010 and 2011 annual reports.

(Photos: Angel Chevrestt)


Even though at least one aspect of the allocation of these funds has been a issue - and has been widely reported - Yankee spokesperson (former NYPD DCPI head flack) Alice T. McGillion told the Post, “This is the first we are hearing of a problem in the allocation of money from the fund. We would be extremely disappointed if that were the case."


The Community Benefits Program (CBP), a contract between the team and Bronx elected officials - (The pact couldn’t be called a Community Benefits Agreement because the community did not participate in its formation) - was established in an effort to blunt strong opposition to the new stadium project. Opposition included the seizing of 25.3 acres of historic public parkland among other impacts to the community. The annual $ 800,000 in payments by the New York Yankees, athletic equipment, free Yankee tickets, and merchandise to various Bronx non-profits was immediately labeled a "slush fund" by local community members.


The charity was supposed to be established, "upon the commencement of the construction of the new Yankee Stadium." The construction began in August 2006. However more than a year after the CBP was supposed to take effect, NYC Park Advocates (NYCPA) discovered that none of the money had been distributed, the charity had not been registered, and the group responsible for administering the fund had even never met. In an auspicious start, the original application was rejected by the IRS because lawyer Michael Drezin, who is organizing the fund, mistakenly filed for non-profit status instead of the private foundation status required when funding comes from one source.


To make worse the elected officials including Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrión made sure that not one penny of the money had to be spent anywhere near the affected community.


"Under the team's proposal, the city would build the new parks at an estimated cost of $50 million, with the team providing an annual comprehensive maintenance fund." - NY Times, Sept 5, 2004.


The comprehensive maintenance fund long promised for the replacement parks never materialized. As part of the original deal, the Yankees had agreed to provide dedicated maintenance funds annually through 2046 to support the new parks being built as part of the stadium project. Only $100,000, however, made it into the final draft of the Community Benefits Program. By the time the agreement was hastily signed on the day of the City Council vote, the politicians had removed all of the money earmarked for the parks.


Remarkably these funds, as small as they were, represented the only money specifically earmarked for the impacted area, and the only money dedicated to the maintenance of these historically deprived South Bronx parks. This is especially ironic considering the entire deal was made possible only through the destruction of the parkland. The final agreement removed the $100,000 earmarked for the new parks and merged it with a $700,000 fund that the Bronx elected officials had set up to dole out to non-profit groups borough-wide.


According to the Bronx borough president's office, the new parks to be built around Yankee Stadium didn't need the dedicated maintenance dollars set aside by the team because parks upkeep is "already getting done" by the city.


In September, Bronx Borough president Adolfo Carrión, Jr. told reporter that the money originally allocated in the CBP for park maintenance would be better spent going to

community non-profits.


Now thanks to Bronx elected officials, the funding long promised for maintenance of the replacement parks has been diverted, and all money in the Community Benefits Program can be spent in any part of the Bronx. - Geoffrey Croft


Bronx


The nonprofit in charge of doling out nearly $1 million a year in New York Yankee cash to Bronx charities is throwing it away on shady organizations, for-profit businesses and barely effective but politically connected community groups, a New York Post investigation found.


The questionable groups supported by the New Yankee Stadium Community Benefits Fund included:


Barbara Gibson

Apparel seller ALFRBA, run by Barbara Gibson received $ 3,000 in 2008 and '09.



* ALFRBA, which bills itself as a free manners and etiquette course but hawks such hip-hop sportswear as do-rags, bucket hats, sweat suits and T-shirts online. It received $3,000 in 2008 and 2009.


* El Maestro, which was a for-profit boxing gym in 2009 when it applied for and received $5,100 for equipment from the fund, which is supposed to support only nonprofits. In 2010 the gym secured nonprofit status, but it still charges members a $100 initiation and $30 to $50 in monthly fees.


* Flo-Bert Ltd., a tap-dance troupe that performs an annual recital in Manhattan. The group got $2,000 in 2009 even though it hadn’t filed paperwork with the IRS since 2007. The feds canceled the purported nonprofit’s tax-exempt status last month.


* Praise, Peace and Pride, which didn’t bother to explain its mission on a 2007 tax form. The charity later explained it in a 2009 filing, but the form showed it didn’t spend a dime on its “youth services.” It filed no tax forms in 2008. Yet it received $5,100 in Yankee money in 2009. It scored another $20,000 in 2010 and 2011, an organizer said. In March, the group announced an effort to “provide medical-health and dental-care assistance for all hip-hop pioneers and their families.”


* The Emma C. Brisbane Foundation, which received a $1,500 grant in 2009 even though the nonprofit after-school center hadn’t submitted required tax filings since 2005. The IRS revoked its tax-exempt status in June.


The Post’s findings left the Yankees frustrated.


Noting that the baseball club had nothing to do with the administration of the funds, spokeswoman Alice McGillion said, “This is the first we are hearing of a problem in the allocation of money from the fund. We would be extremely disappointed if that were the case. And if there is a problem with the allocation of the money, we have a right to conduct our own audit and stop the payments.”


“If appropriate,” she added, “we would also urge the proper authorities to also take a look at the allocation of the funds.”


The Bronx Bombers pledged the yearly donations as part of a “community-benefits agreement” signed with local pols in 2006 to secure parkland and community support for its gleaming new stadium.


Over the last three years, the Yanks have made good on their end of the legally binding deal: delivering an annual $800,000 to the fund to be distributed to Bronx nonprofits, $100,000 for equipment for youth sports groups and 15,000 game tickets.


According to the fund’s former administrator, Michael Drezin, seven voting board members rubber-stamp community groups picked by a three-person subcommittee operating behind closed doors.


Fund President Serafin U. Mariel sits on the panel and picks the other two members.


Mariel is a banker whose name surfaced during the borough’s infamous Wedtech scandal of the 1980s, in which three pols were snared by the feds for taking bribes from a local military-supply company.


Although he was never charged, testimony at trial revealed Mariel had handed the debt-ridden Wedtech owners a briefcase stuffed with $500,000 in cash, reports said.


Mariel and the two other members of the subcommittee “were the only ones who saw the applications” for the Yankee cash, Drezin said.


Often, politically connected charities got instant approval and a bigger piece of the pie, he said.

“During meetings, it was made clear to me that they were favored, preferential applications that got favored, preferential treatment,” he said.


One such charity was BASICS Inc., which runs drug-counseling centers and builds homeless shelters. It has a former assemblyman, a former judge and a sitting judge on its board. The retired jurist, Harold Silverman, is also a member of the Yankee community fund.


Judge Lucindo Suarez ruled against Drezin in a 2009 lawsuit filed against the fund. Drezin claimed he was wrongfully fired because he complained about mismanagement and was not paid his $35,000 annual salary for three years. He said he’s filing an appeal next month.


While questionable groups and pet projects got cash from the fund, several legitimate nonprofits in the shadow of the stadium -- like the community board -- got zilch.“They denied us,” Community Board 4 District Manager José Rodriguez fumed.


The fund’s treasurer, Susan Goldy, refused to turn over the fund’s 2010 and 2011 annual reports, which are mandated by the community-benefits agreement. The Post obtained 2008 and 2009 reports from sources.


Mariel told a Post reporter, “I have nothing to say,” and slammed down the phone.


Virginia Ann Brisbane, president of the Emma Brisbane Center, said she put in for the $1,500 to buy a computer server and chairs -- and that she never had to document finances.


Barbara J. Gibson, the CEO of ALFRBA, defended the etiquette course that gleaned $3,000 in Yankee funding, but declined to discuss the internet apparel line.


Read More:

Shady Bronx community groups get Yankee charity cash

New York Post - September 25 , 2011- By Candice M. Giove, Kevin Sheehan and Gary Buiso


Broken Promises

NYC Park Advocates - 2008 - By Geoffrey Croft & Lukas Herbert


STILL WAITING FOR CASH FROM YANKEES' STADIUM DEAL

New York Daily News - September 5th 2007 - By Frank Lombardi


Yankee Stadium is Going Up, but Bronx Still Seeks Benefits

New York Times - January 7, 2008 - By Timothy Williams


THE ROLE OF COMMUNITY BENEFIT AGREEMENTS IN NEW YORK

CITY’S LAND USE PROCESS

New York City Bar - March 8, 2010




Friday, March 25, 2011

Yankee Parking Garages Narrowly Avoid Default - Again. Debacle Continues

Bronx Parking Development Company's revenues are so dismal that it will most likely have to dip into its debt reserves for the second time in a year just to pay the interest on its bonds.

Results from Aggressive Yankee Parking Revenue Forecasts Promoted by the City's Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and the Bloomberg Administration Priority To Make A Deal At Any Cost Are Finally Hitting Home For Some. Bronx Parking Development Company's revenues are so dismal that it will have to dip into its debt reserves for the second time in a year just to pay the $ 6.9 interest on its bonds due April 1. Bronx Parking issued $237.6 million of municipal bonds in 2007 through New York City’s Industrial Development Agency to build three parking garages and renovate two others. Last week the debt traded at about 60 cents on the dollar. (Photo: Simmons/NY Daily News)

On top of that, the firm - a nonprofit the Bloomberg administration selected and the state subsidized to operate the stadium garages - owes the city $17 million in back rent and taxes for the 21 acres of public land it uses.

The funds were "supposed to" make up for lost city revenue Bloomberg gave away to the Yankees in their deal to build a new stadium. The City received revenue from owning the old Yankee Stadium.

"The public will never see a dime of rent and taxes from this project as it now exists," one official close to the garage company told the New York Daily News.

The company was thrown a life-line at a Monday night meeting when directors agreed to a set of demands from the bondholders in exchange for a one-year "waiver" from a complete default and takeover.

"The agreement will give BPDC and the bondholders time to evaluate potential remedies to the current shortfall," said Bloomberg head cheerleader for the project EDC's Seth Pinsky.

"Over the next year we will be in discussions with all parties involved to evaluate potential alternatives, and should those parties agree, all options will be considered."

A default could set up a seizure by bondholders and would leave the garages' future in question. For the City and the bondholders this embarrassing and potentially very costly situation could mean attempting to develop one or more of the unprofitable garages into something else.

Apparently not all that concerned about the prospect of facing community wrath over the loss of more than 25 acres of public parkland, one option that Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. has been advocating is to tear down one of the big garages and build a new hotel.

The Bloomberg and Pataki administration fought to seize 25.3 acres of public parkland in the South Bronx in order to accommodate the building of a new stadium for the New York Yankees, including the building of thousands of additional parking spaces in the asthma capital of America. The Bloomberg administration selected Bronx Parking in 2007 to build and run the garages after the Yankees demanded a minimum of 9,000 spaces to stay in the Bronx. As predicted the Yankee organization's insistence of building more parking turned into a nightmare for the city's taxpayers and community residents. - Geoffrey Croft

Bronx

The operator of parking garages at the new Yankee Stadium, whose revenue is running 40 percent below projections, will make its April 1 debt payment, according to Nuveen Asset Management, which holds about half of the bonds, according to Bloomberg.

Bronx Parking Development Co., a subsidiary of a non-profit development agency, will make the payment through a combination of operating revenue and a draw on its debt-service reserve fund, John Miller, Nuveen’s chief investment officer, said in an e-mail. According to Bronx Parking’s 2011 budget, it owes $6.9 million on April 1. The reserve fund will decline by a $5.5 million draw, according to the budget.

April 23, 2010 - Parking Lot A- (Former 2.9 acre ball field in Macombs Dam Park) No Surprise. For years critics of the Yankee Stadium redevelopment project have predicted the city's tax-payers would be on the hook for the $340 million parking garage system deal negotiated by the Bloomberg administration. A default could set up a seizure by bondholders and would leave the garages' future in question. Compounding the problem, the administration gave the Yankee organization 600 free spots in the VIP garage. (Photo: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) Click on Image to enlarge.


Bronx Parking issued $237.6 million of municipal bonds in 2007 through New York City’s Industrial Development Agency to build three parking garages and renovate two others at the 50,287-seat stadium, home of the New York Yankees Major League Baseball team. The stadium, which opened in 2009, was built across the street from the original ballpark.

The garages and parking lots managed by the non-profit have generated 39 percent less revenue in the first nine months of 2010 than projected, according to financial statements.

The public financing of the garages, which included $102 million from the city and state, was assailed by neighbors who said the facilities would lead to more traffic congestion and pollution in the South Bronx, while providing no benefit to the community. Labor-backed groups said the city and state shouldn’t subsidize low-wage jobs.

Subway Service

The parking garages face competition from public transportation, as most city dwellers take the subway to games. Fans who live in New York’s Westchester County or Connecticut can take theMetro-North commuter rail.

For the nine months ending Sept. 30, Bronx Parking collected $6.2 million less in revenue and sales taxes than budgeted, according to a financial statement filed on Dec. 30. Bronx Parking plans to charge $35 per car this year, compared with $23 last year.

Nuveen, based in Chicago, owned $116.5 million of the bonds as of the end of February. The debt traded March 17 at about 60 cents on the dollar, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Bonds maturing in 2037 yield about 10.2 percent.

Bonds Attractive

In a March 18 note, Morgan Stanley said the bonds look attractive and are worth at least 80 cents on the dollar. The start-up parking system hasn’t reached its full potential, wrote Peter Block, a Morgan Stanley executive director, in fixed- income trading.

“Bonds are worth at least 80 to the extent the Yankees continue to draw consistently strong attendance as they have done historically, and Bronx Parking Development Co., the project owner, continually monitors and adjusts parking rates as needed over time,” Block wrote.

The Yankees led all Major League teams in attendance last year at 3.77 million, according to ESPN. The garages and lots have 8,428 spaces available to the public. The Yankee stadium garages had an occupancy rate of 60 percent last year, which will continue in 2011, according to Morgan Stanley.

Bronx Parking’s debt service reserve fund will shrink to $11 million from $16.6 million, according to its 2011 operating budget. The debt-service coverage ratio, or the amount of cash available to meet annual interest and principal payments, is 0.56, according to the budget.

Pricing Power

Morgan Stanley’s Block wrote that he wasn’t concerned about the draw on the debt-service reserve because 63 percent of trips to games at the stadium during weekdays are made by car and drivers have limited parking options, giving the garages “adequate” pricing power to raise rates.

To avoid a default, Bronx Parking would have to raise parking rates to $42 in 2013 and to $55 by 2016, Block wrote. The garages will have enough revenue to fully pay debt service by 2015, Block wrote.

William Loewenstein, president of the Community Initiatives Development Corp., the non-profit parent of Bronx Parking Development Co. based in Hudson, New York, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of the Bronx, didn’t return a call seeking comment.

Read More:

Yankee Stadium Parking Garages to Make April 1 Debt Payment, Nuveen Says

Bloomberg - March 23, 2011 - By Martin Z. Braun

New York Daily News - March 25, 2011 - By Juan Gonzalez

A Walk In The Park - March 15, 2011

A Walk In The Park - October 29, 2010

A Walk In The Park - September 10, 2010

A Walk In The Park - June 16, 2010

Field Of Schemes - June 16, 2010 - By Neil deMause


Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Yankee Tax - Payer Built Parking Garages Near Default


April 23, 2010 - Parking Lot A- (Former 2.9 acre ball field in Macombs Dam Park) No Surprise. For years critics of the Yankee Stadium redevelopment project have predicted the city's tax-payers would be on the hook for the $340 million parking garage system deal negotiated by the Bloomberg administration. Bronx Parking Development Co., which runs the garages for the new stadium, faces an April 1 due date for a $6.8 million interest payment on bonds issued to fund construction of three parking facilities. The private development company had to dip into reserves to make a similar payment in October, and—barring a last-minute renegotiation—all signs point to a default this time. A default could set up a seizure by bondholders and would leave the garages' future in question. Compounding the problem, the administration gave the Yankee organization 600 free spots in the VIP garage. (Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) Click on Images to enlarge.

The Bloomberg and Pataki administration fought to seize 25.3 acres of public parkland in the South Bronx in order to accommodate the building of a new stadium for the New York Yankees, including the building of thousands of additional parking spaces in the asthma capital of America. The Bloomberg administration selected Bronx Parking in 2007 to build and run the garages after the Yankees demanded a minimum of 9,000 spaces to stay in the Bronx. As predicted the Yankee organization's insistence of building more parking turned into a nightmare for the city's taxpayers and community residents.

May 20, 2009 - 2.9 acre ball field in Macombs Dam Park. Not Getting it. For more than 70 years the public used the parkland, including this ballfield that the elected officials allowed to be taken for a Yankee parking lot. Instead of restoring parkland that was seized from the community, Borough President Rubén Díaz Jr., is suggesting building a hotel on it, an irresponsible idea left over from the previous BP, Adolfo Carrión, Jr. Elected officials, including then State Assembly member Díaz Jr. allowed the Yankees to take the 25.3 acres of public parkland which, among other things, resulted in a net loss of parkland in the community.

Bronx

The first pitch of the baseball season and the return of thousands of fans cannot come fast enough for most businesses around Yankee Stadium. But one company might prefer that April be postponed this year. Bronx Parking Development Co., which runs the garages for the new stadium, faces an April 1 due date for a $6.8 million interest payment on bonds issued to fund construction of three facilities. The company had to dip into reserves to make a similar payment in October, and—barring a last-minute renegotiation—all signs point to a default this time, according to Crain's.

A default could set up a seizure by bondholders and would leave the garages' future in question. The property, which covers some 21 acres, was part of parkland taken over to make way for the current incarnation of Yankee Stadium. The potential irony has some in the community seething.

“Our community loves its parks, and we could always use more,” said Pastor Wenzell Jackson, chairman of Bronx Community Board 4, which includes the stadium and the surrounding area. “Now there's just empty parking garages that are not benefiting the community.”

A spokesman for Bronx Parking declined to comment on its financial situation. Its parent company, Community Initiatives Development Corp., also would not comment.

BUILD A HOTEL

Community leaders, including Borough President Rubén Díaz Jr., are planning for what comes next. “We've been working diligently to bring a top-flight hotel to the area near Yankee Stadium,” Mr. Díaz said in his State of the Borough Address late last month. “As many of you have heard, the Yankee Stadium parking lots are facing severe financial problems ... and we believe one of the garages could be used for the hotel development.”

It's clear that not all the garages are needed. In August, Bronx Parking admitted that the facilities, which contain 9,000 parking spaces, were never more than 60% full on game days. As a result, it said, revenues were insufficient to service the more than $237 million in tax-exempt bonds issued to fund its project, which involved building three new garages and refurbishing several existing ones.

The garages have more competition than any party involved anticipated—including the city's Industrial Development Agency, which issued the bonds in 2007.

Last year, Bronx Parking officials complained that an estimated 800 cars a game were parking at the nearby Gateway Shopping Center. And for good reason: Spaces at the center cost about $4 an hour, compared with $23 a game for a self-park space in the stadium garages (or $35 for valet service). This year, rates will increase to $35 a game ($45 for valet), according to the company's 2011 operating budget.

Bronx Parking also blamed its shortfall on Metro-North and its new train station at Yankee Stadium, which the company said is reducing the number of cars—the very purpose for building the station (with public money).

According to Metro-North data, an average of 3,900 attendees use the train to get to weekend games, and 3,200 take the train to games during the week.

Meanwhile, residents have groused that despite the garages, street parking spots are consumed by fans on game days.

TIME TO RECONSIDER

Local leaders said it's all a waste.

“The first step should be to reconsider how they're using these parking lots,” said Lourdes Zapata, senior vice president of SoBro, the South Bronx Overall Economic Development Corp. “Looking at them exclusively for parking is a shortsighted way of looking at development in this area.”

The air rights could be used for other commercial purposes or for building housing, Ms. Zapata said. “At this point, I don't think anything should be off the table,” she remarked.

Read More:

Crains - March 13, 2011