Showing posts with label Coney Island boardwalk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coney Island boardwalk. Show all posts

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Parks Department Awards Construction Contracts To Convicted Swindler Without Background Checks


Nicholas Analitis

Convicted swindler Nicholas Analitis was awarded city contracts by the Parks Department as a sub-contractor on two projects - one in Marcus Garvey Park in Harlem and another repairing the Coney Island boardwalk -  without anyone bothering to check his background.   On Sept. 10, Analitis was arrested by the Manhattan DA’s office and the city’s Department of Investigation on charges of fraud in connection with paying his workers at Marcus Garvey with $50,000 worth of rubber checks. He was freed on $50,000 bail.  The Mayor’s Office of Contract Service steered inquiries to the Parks Department,  which did not return calls and email requests for comment. 

City-Wide


A convicted con-man who served three years in prison for passing bad checks and ripping off banks got lucrative city contracts to fix up parks without anyone bothering to look into his background.

He then allegedly stiffed his workers out of $50,000, DNAinfo.com New York has learned.

Nicholas Analitis, 35, of Garden City, virtually walked out of state prison in 2009 and applied for — and received — contracts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Parks Department, for which he worked for the past two years.

He was arrested a few weeks ago for paying his workers at a Harlem site with $50,000 worth of rubber checks, court documents show.

“There was no background check done,” a law enforcement source said. “There is a sizable flaw in the way the city does its business.”

The city’s Procurement Policy Board requires a contracting agency — in this case the Parks Department — to scrutinize the companies they hire. But the PPB’s protocols do not explicitly insist on background checks for contractors.

In November 2010, Analitis, fresh out of state prison, created a new company and officially applied for work with the city.
As required, he filled out a detailed Vendex questionnaire provided by the Mayor’s Office of Contract Services. The Vendex system was created years ago to weed out businesses linked to criminals or organized crime from getting taxpayer-funded projects.

For contracts under $100,000, the accuracy of the questionnaire's answers, however, relies on the honesty of the applicant and does not receive a complete independent review, according to sources.

"There are no teeth," the law enforcement source said.

Analitis took advantage of this loophole and conveniently failed to mention that he had a history of fraud and prison time.
As a result, sources said he was soon hired as a sub-contractor on two worksites, one in Marcus Garvey park in Harlem and another repairing the Coney Island boardwalk.

“Who knows how many more criminals are working for the city when they should not?” the law enforcement source said.

According to court records, Analitis had been arrested several times dating back to at least 2007 for swindling banks and businesses out of roughly $500,000 by passing bad checks and setting up phony businesses on Long Island.

In July 2007, he was arrested for forging a home improvement license to obtain a work permit, stealing a customer’s identity and then taking $121,023 from a bank where he established an account in their name, court records showed.

He also ripped off $78,728 by passing bad checks against another bogus business account he opened, according to a spokesman for Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice.

In all, Analitis spent nearly three years in prison from May 2007 to July 2009, according to corrections officials. Within a month of his release, he created Prestige Builder and Development Ltd., using an address on a Long Island Expressway service road in Syosset, court records show.

About a year later, he applied for work with the city and soon was hired by the Parks Department as a sub-contractor.

Several of his victims, most of them immigrants afraid to speak up, finally mustered the courage to complain to authorities. One of them ultimately wore a wire when he met Analitis about his money.

On the tape, Analitis tells the worker he's angry that there was word on the street that he had been short-changing his employees and tries to intimidate him.

“I’m telling you now,” an irate Analitis said on a court transcript of the recording. “I’ve been through this before. ....I’ve been through this s--t a hundred f--ing times.

“I’ve been through the nice guy thing a hundred f-----g times with people, and you know what I get? I get f---g detectives calling me, saying f----g nonsense."

Even as Analitis came under investigation in Manhattan, he was arrested again in Nassau County last March, allegedly for passing more bad checks — and was held in the county lockup for three months.

Finally, on Sept. 10, Analitis was arrested by the Manhattan DA’s office and the city’s Department of Investigation on charges of fraud in connection with the Harlem rip-off, according to court records. He was freed on $50,000 bail.

But 10 days later, he was picked up yet again in Nassau for scamming $22,750 from a check cashing establishment in Baldwin where he set up another phony company.

The Mayor’s Office of Contract Service steered inquiries to the Parks Department, which did not return calls and email requests for comment.

Meanwhile, Analitis is due back in Manhattan court next Tuesday.  And he is slated to be sentenced in December in Nassau County for his latest crimes on Long Island.

Read More:


City Awarded Contracts To Convicted Swindler Without Background Check
DNAinfo - October 11, 2012 - By  Murray Weiss


Thursday, July 12, 2012

Coney Island Residents Sue To Stop Concrete Boardwalk - Cite Lack of Environmental Review

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 12, 2012

Contact: Geoffrey Croft - NYC Park Advocates
(212) 987- 0565
(646) 584- 8250 cell #

Coney Island Advocacy Groups and Residents File Suit Against the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation to Prevent the Destruction of the Coney Island Boardwalk

(BROOKLYN, NY July 12, 2012) – Various grassroots organizations and Coney Island and Brighton Beach residents have filed a lawsuit in New York State Supreme Court in Brooklyn seeking to prevent the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (the “Parks Department”) from destroying the historic Coney Island Boardwalk and replacing it with a plastic and concrete structure.

According to the lawsuit, the Parks Department abused its discretion when it decided that its plan for the Boardwalk was not subject to any environmental review, even though the potential for negative environmental impact is obvious and far-reaching.

The lawsuit seeks to prevent the Parks Department from implementing a plan to replace 56,000 square feet of wood boards on the section of the Coney Island Boardwalk running from Coney Island Avenue to Brighton 15th Street with concrete and plastic. The lawsuit also contends that the Parks Department has a longer-range plan to replace most of the Boardwalk – approximately 1 million square feet of wood – with some combination of the same concrete and plastic materials.

The lawsuit contends that the Parks Department violated the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) and New York City’s Environmental Quality Review (“CEQR”) regulations by not subjecting its plans to the necessary environmental review. Under SEQRA and CEQR, state and municipal agencies are required to determine if actions they undertake may have a significant impact on the environment. Under the law, factors such as erosion, flooding, drainage problems, and impact on existing use must be considered. Additionally, an agency must consider the project’s impairment of the character or quality of important historical or aesthetic resources and existing community or neighborhood character.

The suit was filed by attorneys from Goodwin Procter, LLP, pro bono counsel for the Petitioners: the Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance, Friends of the Boardwalk, and long-time residents Robert Burstein, Ida Sanoff, Arlene Brenner, Brunilda Figueroa and Todd Dobrin.

“The city is required to consider a host of issues including environmental impacts before embarking on such a project which they did not ,” said Burstein, President of the Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance. "This project raises numerous public safety concerns which have not been addressed."

Among the impacts not considered:

· Concrete, which does not allow for drainage, creates a heightened risk of flooding and beach erosion when there are storms.

· The lack of drainage, in addition to damaging the concrete and plastic itself, also causes snow and rain to ice over in the winter, creating hazardous conditions and necessitating the use of hazardous chemicals and/or snow plows to clear the area.

· The increase in temperature of the concrete surface as compared to natural wood can cause an urban heat island effect, resulting in increased energy consumption, elevated emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases and impaired water quality in the surrounding community.

· The replacement of cracking concrete and buckling plastic may require the wholesale removal of sections of materials, causing greater environmental damage and disruption to activities than removal of one damaged wooden plank would cause.

· The demolition of the iconic wooden boardwalk that has been in the community for nearly 90 years and is part of a world-famous area would significantly impair the character and quality of what is obviously an important historical and aesthetic resource. Additionally, the demolition would equally impair the character of the Coney Island and Brighton Beach communities.

· Concrete and plastic absorb substantially less force than wood and therefore place far greater stress on the body. Consequently, people who enjoy the boardwalk for running, dancing, exercising and walking will be greatly restricted in their ability to use the Boardwalk as they have for decades.

The lawsuit seeks to compel the Parks Department to conduct a comprehensive environmental review of its plans, including a thorough analysis of these and other environmental impacts. “This is just the beginning of the battle,” said Burstein. “Ultimately, we do not believe the Parks Department should, under the environmental laws, use concrete and plastic to replace the wood. The first step, though, is to get the Parks Department to do the necessary environmental review, which they have not even done.”

Additionally, the lawsuit asserts that the Parks Department is trying to achieve its long-term plan to destroy most of the Boardwalk, aside from one four-block section, and replace it with plastic and concrete without conducting a proper environmental analysis of this large-scale action by improperly segmenting the plan. “It’s death by a thousand cuts,” said Burstein. “It is wrong. And it is illegal."

"Rather than spend the money to properly maintain the Boardwalk," said Brighton Beach resident Ida Sanoff, "the Parks Department wants to destroy this beautiful piece of New York and replace it with a different structure altogether without any environmental review or community input.”

About the Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance and Friends of the Boardwalk

The Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance is an unincorporated association dedicated to supporting and encouraging the revitalization and improvement of the Boardwalk while preserving its aesthetic and historical integrity. http://savetheboardwalk.wordpress.com/

Friends of the Boardwalk is a not-for-profit corporation that was founded to initiate, support and encourage projects for the revitalization and improvement of the Boardwalk and surrounding communities. http://fobconeyisland.com/

Read More:

Boardwalk Advocates File Suit to Block Concrete

New York Times - July 12, 2012 - By Liz Robbins


Friday, June 22, 2012

Two Rescued In Coney Island Waters -One In Critical Condition

UPDATE

RESCUE23N_4_WEB

A suicidal man was rescued after after jumping into the waters off of Coney Island on Friday morning. He was rushed to Coney Island Hospital where police said he was in a serious condition. (Photos: Danny Iudici for NY Daily News)

A heroic Brooklyn father named Lawrence Bowers dove into the waters to try and save the man, according to the New York Daily News. Bowers kept battling his way towards the man and was about a foot away when a rescue team of scuba divers arrived in a helicopter.

Brooklyn

Two men drowning in the waters off of Coney Island were rescued near West 19th Street and Riegelmann Boardwalk this morning.

One is in critical condition the other is in serious but stable condition at Coney Island Hospital.

The incident occurred at approximate 7:18am according to fire officials.

EMS brought one man to shore. The other victim was transferred from a private boat onto FDNY Marine 3 (boat) at 7:39 a.m. - Geoffrey Croft

RESCUE23N_1_WEB


Read More:

New York Daily News - June 22, 2012 - By Matt Lysiak and Christina Boyle

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Boardwalk Slight - Coney-Brighton Beach Residents Demand If Rockaway Can Have Wood Why Can't We

"Research, what research. We didn't have time to do research; we had to spend the money!" - Parks Department Chief Engineer John Natoloi - November 2010

Boardwalk War: The city is using wood exclusively to repair a ten block section Rockaway Rockaway Beach boardwalk - after refusing to use wood solely to rebuild the Coney Island Boardwalk. In March the Mayoral appointed Public Design Commission unanimously approved the Parks Department's plan to use concrete on the historic Coney-Brighton Boardwalk instead of wood in what critics called a "sham" hearing. (Photo: Elizabeth Graham)

In November 2010, Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance President Rob Burstein attended a walk-through meeting on the boardwalk with politicians including Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz and Parks officials to go over the numerous "pilot projects" recently done which used recycled plastic lumber or concrete instead of wood.

Mr. Burstein asked Parks Department Chief Engineer John Natoloi what research had been done that suggested that concrete was the best, or even an appropriate material to spend $15 million dollars on the boardwalk.

"Research? What research? We didn't have time to do research; we had to spend the money!"
he famously replied.

"With respect to the diligence and quality of the Parks Department's efforts to appropriately care for our Boardwalk, this statement speaks for itself," said Mr. Burstein.

Brooklyn

A city decision to repair an outer-borough boardwalk with wood has opponents of the Coney Island Boardwalk’s upcoming concrete makeover accusing the Parks Department of turning back on its word, according to the Bay News.
Agency officials have said repeatedly that repairing city boardwalks with wood was no longer a viable option — sparking the move to replace the iconic Coney Island Boardwalk with concrete and plastic lumber.
But the city began repairing a 10-block stretch of the longer, but far less exciting, Rockaway boardwalk with lumber last week — a move that has Coney Boardwalk advocates spitting nails.
“It’s an unbelievable slap in the face to our communities,” said Rob Burstein, the president of the Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance. “It shows that it’s possible to have a wooden boardwalk.”
  Queens Parks Commissioner Dorothy Lewandowski and Parks Department Chief Engineer John Natoli inspect the repairs being made to the boardwalk on Friday near Beach 101st St. Hurricane Irene caused extensive damage to the boardwalk in August.

Parks Department Chief Engineer John Natol seen here with Queens Parks Commissioner Dorothy Lewandowski inspecting the repairs being made to the boardwalk last week near Beach 101st St. in Rockaway Beach. (Photo: Anthony Delmundo/for the New York Daily News)


Friends of the Boardwalk founder Todd Dobrin was also outraged.
“I’m furious,” said Dobrin, who has been fighting the city’s plans to take away the Boardwalk’s cherished planks. “Every boardwalk should be treated equally.”
But city officials say they’re not flip-flopping.
“Under a full reconstruction of the Rockaway boardwalk, we would consider using concrete,” said Parks Department spokeswoman Meghan Lalor, who said repairs on the Rockaway boardwalk, which drew 3.6 million visitors last year, will replace planks Hurricane Irene turned into kindling last year.
A one-mile section of the 5.5-mile walk has already been paved over with concrete, Lalor noted.
Councilman Eric Ulrich (R–Queens) doled out $1.6 million in taxpayer dollars to help repair the Rockaway boardwalk.
That news wasn’t lost on critics who slammed Councilman Domenic Recchia (D–Coney Island) for supporting the city’s plan to replace the Boardwalk between Coney Island Avenue and Brighton 15th Street with concrete and recycled plastic lumber.
“We need elected officials to support the Boardwalk here the way that they did in Queens,” Burstein said.
Recchia declined to comment on this story.
In 2010, the Parks Department proposed replacing the entire Boardwalk with concrete and plastic lumber — except for a four-block section in the historic amusement district between W. 15th and W. 10th streets — as part of its $30-million renovation of the aging 2.7-mile span, which opened in 1923.
The agency tested the materials on two sections of the walkway in 2011, claiming that concrete was sturdier and cheaper than using real wood.
But preservationists balked at the suggestion, claiming the plan would ruin the look and feel of the historic Boardwalk and turn the rest of the strip into a sidewalk.
The Public Design Commission gave the Parks Department the OK to tear out the Boardwalk in Brighton Beach — and install a 12-foot-wide concrete lane for emergency vehicles and a 19-foot-wide lane built out of recycled plastic boards for pedestrians — after agency officials testified that wood was no longer a viable option.
Yet residents say the current repair project in Queens proves otherwise.
“I can’t understand their reasoning,” said Brighton Beach resident Arlene Brenner. “It’s ridiculous.”

Separate and unequal: Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance President Rob Burstein is furious that the city is repairing the Queens boardwalk with wood but paving over large sections of Brooklyn’s seaside walkway with concrete in yet another "pilot" program. (Photo: Elizabeth Graham)
Read More:

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Concrete Coney Island Boardwalk Plan Approved Over Strong Community Objections In "Sham" Hearing

















There is nothing more frusterating than watching a process that is outside of your control.
It was standing room only at the Public Design Commission hearing on the reconstruction of the Coney Island boardwalk. Critics of the controversial plan said they wanted to be heard as well as listened to but that was not to be. The Mayoral appointed commission as expected voted unanimously to approve the Parks Department's plan to use concrete on the historic boardwalk instead of wood. Forty-five members of the public testified against the Parks Department plan and vs. three in favor. At one point it appeared one of the commissioners - Byron Kim - was making some headway, but in the end he too was ignored.
(Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates)

Brooklyn

By Geoffrey Croft

In a nearly four- hour, and at times contensious meeting, the City's Public Design Commission unanimously approved the Parks Department's controversial plan to use concrete on the historic boardwalk in Coney Island. The plan was approved over the objections of the near unanimous members of the public who attended the proceedings.

Due to the city's refusal to allocate adequate funding to maintain the iconic Coney Island boardwalk the city is proposed installing a 12 foot wide concrete sidewalk down the middle flanked on each side by plastic composite planks. The test area will run from Coney Island Avenue to Brighton 15th Street.

The issue has received a considerable amount of attention.


















Critics including Brooklyn residents, environmentalists, and preservation advocates filled the room to capacity.


To divert attention away from the lack of maintenance funding issue the Parks Department is contending the reason for the switch to plastic is to accommodate emergency vehicles, a use, critics point out the wooden boardwalk has accommodated for close to a century.

Landscape architect Alex Hart, assistant deputy chief of design for the NYC Parks Dept., presented the proposal to six commissioners while dozens of Brooklyn residents, environmentalists, preservations, and advocates looked on, filling the room to capasity.

He and other Park officials stated they have had trouble finding a reliable supply and acceptable quality of more environmentally friendly hardwood.

















Alex Hart, assistant deputy chief of design for the Parks Dept., presents the agency's controversial proposal to the Public Design Commission on reconstruction of Coney Island's boardwalk.


"We would greatly prefer to use wood on this surface but there is nothing out there right now that will work for us," said Hart.

The city also claims that concrete is the most cost-effective solution.

Operating under the Parks Department's standard 'we have the capital funds but we have to spend it immediately before we lose it' policy the agency lobbies local elected officials, community boards and agencies for support in order to receive the necessary approvals.

City Councilman Domenic M. Recchia Jr. Chair of the City Council Finance Committee did his part. He testified in favor of the plan repeatedly saying it "has to move forward."

"It doesn't make people happy," he said of his support to loud hisses and boos from the crowd.

He acknowledged the condition of the boardwalk was due to not having adequate expense funding. The expense money, "couldn't be there, " he said. Mr. Recha, who represents the Coney Island district did not say why the money could not be there or mention how much money he allocates annually for boardwalk maintenance. He did state however he'd rather see funds be spent on other services.

He testified (erroneously) that if the boardwalk was wood it would cost one million dollars a year to maintain. (A figure he also cited to the NY Times a few week earlier.) After his testimony he was informed that the million dollar figure he cited was actually the amount in funding the parks department receives for boardwalks at three locations not just Coney Island. When asked for a comment on the misstated figure afterwards he said to shut off the tape recorder and he ran away.

After the nearly hour long presentation critics got their turn. Loud boos rang out when it was announced the public would only get two minutes to speak.

At one point Jackie Snyder, Executive Director of the Commission told a staff member to call DCAS security. A uniformed officer stayed throughout the remainder of the hearing keeping an eye on the crowd. (When the meeting was over the officer aggressively cleared out the hallway where community members were doing interviews.)

Speaker after speaker testified against the plan, pleading with the commission to reject it. They also implored the Parks Department to perform due diligence and explore alternatives.

The numerous contradictions were also noteworthy:

Critics repeatedly poked holes in the agency's claims. They pointed out the hundreds of cracks already found in the newly installed concrete, and that concrete collects sand and water and ices up during the Winter which creates unsafe conditions. They also testified that the concrete is blinding and boiling hot in the Summer. The public also questioned the financial sense of the Parks Department continuing to build projects through trial and error at the taxpayers expense and using capital funds - borrowed money - instead of simply maintaining the wooden boards.

"City officials have insisted on the need for a concrete section because they say the recycled-plastic lumber could become too slippery when wet to accommodate emergency vehicles. But throughout the hearing, speakers from the public castigated concrete, some holding up pictures that showed experimental concrete sections of the Coney Island Boardwalk that were cracked, chipped or covered in ice," wrote the New York Times.

Friends of the Boardwalk's Todd Dobrin displayed a ten foot wide panel with numerous photographs showing the boardwalk in various states of decay including the Parks Department's previous work on their Coney Island/Brighten Beach "pilot" construction projects recently which were approved by the Commission.

"It creates an esthetic and maintenance nightmare, " said Rob Burstein, president of the Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance of the proposed Parks plan.

Tim Keating, of Rainforest Relief has been trying to get the city to stop using rainforest wood for fifteen years and discounted much of what Park officials stated. He suggested using black locust wood for the boardwalk slabs over recycled plastic supports.

"This could be used to maintain an open air boardwalk without concrete slabs that would allow sand and rain and snow to fall through," he testified.

"The concrete is blinding in summer. And hot," said Coney Island/Brighten Beach resident Arlene Brenner.

"Concrete in place of wooden planks does not make a boardwalk it make a sidewalk which is a very different new York environment," a woman testified. A sentiment shared by many.

All told 45 members of the public testified against the Parks Department plan, including representatives from many groups.

Three testified in favor of the plan: the chair of CB 13 - Eddie Mark, the administration's go-to-guy when they need public support for issues the community is against, (The CB overwhelming voted against the plan (21- 7). Fresh Meadows Queens resident Gene Ridder, and Parks Department partner New Yorkers For Parks. The group, now headed by a former HUD official, was repeatedly singled out and criticized by various members of the public during the hearing.

After hours of public testimony the Commission then began asking questions of the parks department.

In what some thought was a ray of hope a few members began questioning aspects of the plan, but that hope quickly dissipated. They suggested that Parks remove two feet of concrete - from 12 feet to 10. And in another misguided thread commissioners challenged the Parks Department to relocate the concrete swath now set to run through the middle of the boardwalk away from the beach closer to the land.

Commission member James Polshek called the design “silly, ” adding that it reduces the beauty of the boardwalk by cutting a cement path through its center. He proposed moving the cement section to the edge of the boardwalk along street side so the area “continues to resemble a boardwalk.”

But it was commissioner Byron Kim who raised the only real points that addressed the public's concerns. He repeatedly challenged the validity of the Parks Department's claims that they could find no other alternative woods that meet the quantity or quality they agency requires.

Two separate suppliers gave testimony they could supply sustainable wood,
one coming all the way from West Virginia.

The Parks Department could provide no specific information on the depth of its research into this area or for many of its other claims, nor did commissioners ask them to.

Mr. Kim also suggested that since this was a pilot program why doesn't the Parks Department test different woods.

In a back and forth between commissioner Kim and the Parks Department the agency admitted that the concrete recently installed had created public safety issues including icing up during the Winter.

In a somewhat surreal moment, Signe Nelsen, the acting president of the Commission said in the future the Parks Department should consider planting their own trees grow their lumber.

Ms. Nelsen also praised the Parks Department for what she described as a quick response in addressing the agency discontinuing using rain forest wood. A comment Tim Keating of Rainforest Relief took particular offense at.

"It took the Parks Department fifteen years after we first notified them to finally decide to renovate the boardwalk without using tropical wood," he said.

In the end, as expected the Mayoral appointed commission ignored the nearly unanimous public testimony against the plan. They also ignored the lone commissioner who suggested testing alternative woods.

Instead of tabling the plan and requiring the Parks Department to perform due diligence, the commission fell in line with the administration and approved it with several non-binding stipulations. They asked the Parks Department to look into the feasibility of moving the concrete section to the land side of the boardwalk, removing two feet of concrete, and exploring alternative wood.

The not binding recommendations means that the Parks Department can proceed without incorporating any of the suggestions.

Critics were not pleased.

“They changed their story every time, ” Todd Dobrin said of the Park Department.

“First they said it was for the emergency vehicle, and we showed they could go on the wood. Then it was about slippage, and we said, ‘What about the snow and ice, which can’t drain off the concrete?’ Then they come up with cost. We said, ‘What about paying to remove all the ice and snow and to maintain the concrete?’ Then they said they couldn’t find the supplies, so we brought in three different suppliers.”

"It's disheartening to be subjected to the whims and decisions of the Parks Department and the Design Commission, " Rob Burstein, president of the Coney-Brighton Boardwalk Alliance said after the vote. "There is no serious exploration of the material provided."

"What good is the Design Commission when a nearly unanimous public testified against the plan and they approve it anyways," said Natural Resources Protective Association Chairperson and Brighten Beach resident Ida Sanoff. "It's a disgrace."

"It was a sham," said Tim Keating of Rainforest Relief of the meeting. "It was predetermined and in places seemed rehearsed. There was nothing that was said that could have prevented the outcome.

The saddest part for me is how poorly the boardwalk is being engineered. New York City missed a golden opportunity to create a truly sustainable boardwalk and a model that could be emulated in towns and cities across the country. In no way have they accomplished that."

Read/View More:

New York Times - March 13, 2012 - By Lisa W. Foderaro and Liz Robbins

NY 1 - March 13, 2012 - By Jeanine Ramirez

John Gambling Show - March 13, 2012

New York Post - March 12, 2012 - By Rich Calder

New York Daily News - March 12, 2012 - By Erin Durkin

WNYC - March 12, 2012 - By Denise Blostein

New York Observer - March 12, 2012 - By Matt Chaban

WABC News - March 12, 2012- By Tim Fliesher

1010 WINS - March 12, 2012 - Sonia Rincon

Brooklyn Daily - March 12, 2012 - By Daniel Bush

USA Today - March 12, 2012

The Brooklyn Blog - March 12, 2012 - By Rich Calder

The Wall Street Journal - March 12, 2012 - By Luara Kusisto

A Walk In The Park - October 24, 2011

A Walk In The Park - October 4, 2011

A Walk In The Park - July 2, 2011

A Walk In The Park - June 14, 2011

A Walk In The Park - March 24, 2011