Showing posts with label Inwood Hill Park. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inwood Hill Park. Show all posts

Monday, September 8, 2014

UPDATE: Woman Mugged/Pepper Sprayed In Inwood Hill Park

Manhattan

By Geoffrey Croft

A 23-year-old woman walking her dog was pepper sprayed and robbed this morning in Inwood Hill Park, NYC Park Advocates has learned.


The victim passed a man sitting on a picnic bench near the basketball and tennis courts.  Without warning the man approached her from behind and pepper sprayed her in the face and grabbed the small gold chain from her neck.  He fled on foot into the park. 

Law enforcement sources say no words were exchanged before the robbery. 

The incident occurred at 6:45am as she headed towards the park exit near Isham Street and Seaman Avenue.

The perpetrator is described as a dark skinned male, possibly hispanic, 20-25 years-old,  between 5'9-5'11 solid build wearing a black tank top and long basketball shorts.  

Sunday, October 13, 2013

1991 Inwood Hill Park "Baby Hope" Murder Case Finally Solved - Cousin Confesses To Sexually Assaulting, Killing Toddler Anjelica Castillo

An NYPD detective examines a blue cooler off the Henry Hudson Parkway after the body of a baby girl was found stuffed inside it on July 23, 1991.
An NYPD detective examines a blue cooler found dumped in Inwood Hill Park off the Henry Hudson Parkway after the body of a 4-year-old baby girl - now idenfied as Anjelica Castillo - was found stuffed inside it on July 23, 1991.    (Photo: Thomas Monaster /New York Daily News)

On May 25, 2004 volunteers discovered the body of 21-year-old Juliard Student Sarah Fox in Inwood Hill Park.

Manhattan


The answer to the Baby Hope murder mystery was all in the family.

Cops arrested a cousin of the toddler brutally murdered 22 years ago — marking a dramatic turn in one of the city’s most notorious cold cases, according to the New York Daily News. 

Conrado Juarez, 52, confessed Saturday to killing the girl and disposing of her body in a cooler with the help of his sister, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said.


His tiny victim, whose name had been a mystery for more than two decades, was identified for the first time as 4-year-old Anjelica Castillo.

Juarez, a dishwasher from the Bronx, told cops he sodomized and then quietly smothered Anjelica with a pillow in a hallway at his sister’s home in Astoria, Queens.

When the little girl went motionless, Juarez summoned his sister, Balvina Juarez-Ramirez, from another room, Kelly said.

POOL PHOTO
Conrado Juarez, who confessed to sexually assaulting and killing a 4-year-old in 1991, sits in the courtroom before his arraignment Saturday night.   (John Minchillo/Pool Photo)


Anjelica Castillo's body was folded in half,  bound and placed in a garbage bag inside a blue and white cooler. She had been smothered and sexually molested, and her body was badly decomposed when she was found.

Juarez told police he smothered her with a pillow while raping her.  When the girl went motionless,  Juarez told police,  he summoned his sister from another room. It was the sister who told Juarez to get rid of the body and who provided the cooler. (The sister has since died)Juarez and his sister then hailed a cab to Manhattan,  dropped the cooler off in a wooded area in Inwood Hill Park near the parkway,  and then went their separate ways.

    


Juarez-Ramirez, who was caring for the girl, insisted they secretly get rid of her body, Kelly said.  She brought him a filthy cooler — as the other family members living there remained unaware of the cruelty underway just down the hall, Kelly said.

Juarez and his sister, who is now dead, carried the cooler out of the apartment and took a black livery cab to Manhattan, where they dumped the icebox along a wooded stretch of the Henry Hudson Parkway.

“They then separated and Juarez returned to the Bronx and his sister to Queens,” Kelly said, “never to speak of the heinous act again until the NYPD investigators, through their relentless investigation, caught up with Juarez.”

The man’s arrest on Friday capped a case that vexed some NYPD investigators throughout their entire careers.


“You know that phrase, ‘I’m on cloud nine’? That’s where I am right now,” said former NYPD Detective Jerry Giorgio, who had the case for more than two decades until retiring from the NYPD in 1997.

The child’s rotting remains were found stuffed inside the blue and white picnic cooler along the parkway near Inwood on July 23, 1991. The little girl weighed only 28 pounds and had been folded in half. She was naked, bound and sexually abused.

Detectives pursued hundreds of leads that turned up nothing. As the years passed, the investigators’ affection and sorrow for the mystery child grew. They eventually named her Baby Hope.

Investigators paid for the the nameless girl’s burial at St. Raymond’s Cemetery in the Bronx and inscribed a touching message on her tombstone: “Because we care.”

“I’m very happy and certainly I’m relieved to the fact that when we visit this plot out in St. Raymond’s we can now attach a name to this little girl,” Joseph Reznick, the former commander of the detectives in the 34th Precinct in Washington Heights, said Saturday.


The case returned to the spotlight last week when cops announced that an anonymous phone tip led them to identify the dead girl’s mother.


Detectives obtained the mom’s DNA profile from an envelope she had licked. Her DNA matched a sample taken from Anjelica’s remains, a source said.

Investigators built up the family tree, tracing relatives from Queens to the Bronx and all the way to Mexico, where Anjelica’s father was born.

They learned that when the child’s parents split, her father took her and a sister to the home in Queens. Anjelica’s mother, who a source said had 10 children by three men, took custody of a third sister, Kelly said.

The girl’s unidentified father has not been found, a source said.


Baby Hope's grave, which did not have a name or identification on it since 1991 until recently.

Baby Hope's grave, which did not have a name or identification on it since 1991 until recently.    (Photo: Ricard Harbus For New York Daily News) 



They learned that when the child’s parents split, her father took her and a sister to the home in Queens. Anjelica’s mother, who a source said had 10 children by three men, took custody of a third sister, Kelly said.

The girl’s unidentified father has not been found, a source said.

Through old-fashioned street work, detectives tracked down Juarez’s Bronx address. Juarez’s daughter answered the door and told cops a lie: that Juarez now lived in Mexico and had been there for the past 12 years, Kelly said. But his wife told investigators a different story, saying he was at work at a downtown Manhattan restaurant.

Investigators used a ruse to lure Juarez out of the eatery and then persuaded him to talk with them, a law enforcement source said.

The interrogation lasted five hours, the source added.

“At the beginning he was blowing smoke, but he finally just gave it up,” the source said.

When Juarez confessed, “it was like there was a big weight lifted off his shoulders,” a different source said.

The mustachioed monster said nothing as he was led out of the cold case offices in Brooklyn, his hands cuffed behind his back.

Juarez, a father of four also known as Enidino Juarez, was charged with second-degree murder and showed no remorse at his arraignment late Saturday night. He pleaded not guilty and was ordered held without bail.


“I think we have a long way to go before we know what really happened,” his court-appointed lawyer, Michael Croce, said after the hearing.


Juarez’s neighbors in Morris Heights recalled seeing the quiet, unassuming man pushing shopping carts full of bottles he had collected.

“He would be digging through trash cans,” said Andre Holloway, 30. “He was always by himself.”

Giorgio said he expects Juarez to draw quite a bit of unwanted attention behind bars.

“They will have their way with this guy in prison, even though he’s in his 50s,” the ex-detective told the Daily News. “But what bugs me is that he got to live for another 20 years with no conscience at all.”





Read More:

'Baby Hope' case: Cousin confesses to sexually assaulting, killing toddler 
Anjelica Castillo more than two decades ago  
New York Daily News -  October 12, 2013 - By Barry Paddock, Thomas Tracy , Rocco Parascandola and Rich Schapiro  


CNN -  October 14,  2013 - By Melissa Gray  



Saturday, July 6, 2013

UPDATE: Homeless Man Attacks Woman In Inwood Hill Park

"Help me, Help. Somebody help me."   -  Victim



A  park patron pins an "emotional disturbed person" to the ground who attacked a woman taking photos early this morning in Inwood Hill Park.  Bystanders came to aid of the victim after hearing repeated cries for help.  The woman suffered cuts to her face. The man was taken to North Bronx Hospital for psychiatric evaluation.


Manhattan


By Geoffrey Croft


A woman out taking photos in Inwood Hill Park early this morning was attacked by a homeless man and park patrons stepped in and apprehended the deranged man NYC Park Advocates has learned.


Bystanders heard the woman - who police described as in her 50's - crying out for help and came to her aid and held the man until police came. 

According to police a black male approached the woman and accused her of taking photos of him and demanded she delete the photos. When she informed him she did not taken photos of him he became irate and took a swipe at the camera knocking her to the ground.


She suffered lacerations to her face and was taken to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital.  

The assailant -  approximately 35-40-years-old was taken to North Bronx Hospital for psychiatric evaluation.

He has refused to identify himself to police.    

The incident occurred this morning at 8:00am on the northwest end of the baseball fields on the path heading toward the soccer fields.

Area resident Connie Vasquez had just exited the dog run with her greyhound and some freinds when she heard a woman screaming,  "Help me, Help. Somebody help me."  

"At first,  we thought it was kids playing,  but because the woman kept yelling HELP ME,  we soon realized someone needed help," she said.

When she arrived eight people had him surrounded on the floor and a large man had his left foot on the alleged assailant's shoulder pinning him on the ground.



According to Ms. Vasquez, the woman's face was red and the victom said she may have been "hit in the face."  The woman who had a camera with her - said she was "just shaken up,'" but was not seriously hurt.  



The victim thanked park patrons for coming to help.



"Crime is an issue" said Ms. Vasquez who has lived in the area for six years and is member of the Northern Manhattan Civilian Observation Patrol (NMCOP),  overseen by the 34th Precinct.



She applauded her neighbors who got involved. 


"I love that about this neighborhood," she said.

"CUDOS to the neighborhood heroes. Several people interceded and one man had his foot on the would-be assailant. THIS is our Inwood at its very best: neighbors looking out for each other and taking action,"  she posted on Facebook. 

Several people posted comments and photos of the incident on Facebook. 




























 Police and an ambulance at the scene early this morning in Inwood Hill Park. 


Ms. Vasquez said the police responded with lighting speed. The first officer to arrive came in a small vehicle.

"I was flabbergasted how fast that golf cart with the officer came," she said. 

The NYPD were unable to provide details of this morning's incident at this time other than to say the man was removed to the hospital as an emotional disturbed person.  They added it was not a mugging.

We will update the story when additional information becomes available. 

"I hope this woman is okay," said Susan Ryan who has been raising the alarm for greater security and more maintenance in area parks after her husband was violently mugged in Isham Park last June.  

"This incident in broad daylight once again underscores the need for dedicated PEP officers and for security cameras in Inwood Hill Park.  Inwood's beautiful parks are woefully neglected because Inwood is a poor community of color and because every elected official who represents Inwood ignores their constituents when it comes to the issue of Park Safety.  The 34th Precinct's manpower is already stretched thin to begin with.  In addition, the 34th Precinct has more parkland than any other precinct in Manhattan except for Central Park which has it's own police precinct. Central Park also has 31 security cameras.  Seems like the wealthy get more resources for Park Safety.  Not only is this totally unacceptable, it's a violation of our civil rights.  What do our elected officials do about it?  Nothing."

"There's nowhere near enough park workers or park enforcement," added Connie Vasquez, a sentiment shared by many in the community. 

"It's bedlam up here in the summer in Inwood Hill Park on the weekends.  It's disgusting.  The coolers with alcohol with start arriving by 10am.  You can smell the pot, and people leave garbage everywhere. No one cleans up and no one seems to be doing anything about it, " she said. 

Read More:


Woman Attacked While Taking Pictures In Inwood Hill Park Police

WCBS - July 6, 2013 










Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Isham Park Camera Cover Up - Installed To Thwart Crime But Not Turned On

"I've got a list 8 pages long of crimes that have happened in Isham and Inwood Parks over the last couple of years. Crimes have happened  between  7am and 8pm. The only time that crimes are NOT happening is at the times the Parks Dept is turning the camera on. How on earth is this an efficient use of our tax dollars?"  -  Susan Ryan
























Isham Park Memorial Circle where the Parks Department (DPR) installed a camera (top right) in July 2012 after a string of violent attacks in an around the park.  According to the agency the camera carries a 24-hour live feed.  However NYC Park Advocates has learned that the camera is only recording a few hours a day - 24 hour feed to nowhere -  in the middle of the night when the park is closed. (Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) click on images to enlarge. 

Not Really.  The camera records from 1am to 5am.  Instead of fixing the problem and being honest with the community who have repeatedly inquired about the hours of operation the Parks Department instead has chosen not to cooperate.  "I feel that advertising/posting what the two cameras NYC Parks has purchased for Isham Park do and dont cover and when would minimize their effectiveness as a crime deterrent," wrote the Park Administrator to nieghborhood resident Susan Ryan.

Ms. Ryan and other community residents are organizing around the greater need for park maintenance and safety. 

Manhattan

By Geoffrey Croft

A security camera installed in a known crime area in an upper Manhattan park is only being turned on for a few hours a day - after the park is closed NYC Park Advocate has learned. 

A camera was installed in Isham Park  under the direction of the Parks Department after a string of violent attacks in and around the park including a particularly violent mugging last June that left a Grammy Award winning husband and parent requiring surgery to his face.

For years residents have been calling for increased security and better maintenance in and around Isham and Inwood Hill Parks and along Park Terrace East & West after repeated incidents.

A review of crime on these park properties since 2010 alone reveal more than 20 incidents including muggings, sexual assaults and car break-ins. 

The camera in Isham Park is only turned on between the hours of 1am - 5am after the 20 acre park is closed.

The camera's hours of operation revelation came to light recently when members of the community complained about illegal drug activity in the park and asked the NYPD's 34th Pct. to review the footage. The police were unable to. 

The Parks Department was informed by the contractor that the footage was not available because the camera was not turned on according to several city sources. 

"This is beyond ridiculous, " said Susan Ryan whose husband Michael O'Reilly was violently mugged in June 2012 while walking home from work thorough Isham Park.

"What's the point of having it when its not recording. We depend on it being  up here to deter crime and to help catch criminals.   We average about mugging  a month up here."





























Bloody Sweatshirt - Michael O'Reilly was wearing during June 6, 2012 violent assault that occured at that location.  


On the evening of June 6th at approximately 7:30 pm Susan's husband Michael entered Isham Park from Broadway after just having exited the subway as many residents do. He passed a man texting on the first ledge beside an enormous Gingko tree, a person they now think was a look-out for his criminal partners. 

Mr. O' Reilly was walking on a main path that cuts  through the park when he saw two young hispanics near Memorial Circle.  One was siting on a granite bench and the other was leaning up against the ledge across from him. 

As he made is way past them he was suddenly attacked and punched in the face by one of the assailants.  They pushed him down on the bench and held him down by his neck. They took $ 40 dollars and placed is wallet into his back pocket. They then ran off.

Mr. O' Reilly called his wife and who arrived a few minutes later.

"I came out to help him. He was covered in blood," said Susan.

"There was blood all over the bench."  

The one consolation they thought was that the City had originally installed a flashcam camera less than eight feet away literally directly above where her husband had just been mugged.   They were in for another surprise. Unbeknownst to them the camera had been removed. 

"I looked up the camera was not there," she said. "We had no idea they moved the camera. You can still see the bracket where it was mounted."

They later found out flash cam was moved to Park Terrace East.

"I feel this is an area where people know they can make quick cash,"  she said. 

Approximately 5 weeks later a contractor working under the Parks Department installed a brand new fixed camera that covered the area.

"That camera is valuable tool that the police need. We just found out there was another violent crime across the street in Inwood Hill.

For months  Ms. Ryan has been trying to get information about the camera from the Parks Department but has been stonewalled. 

"They tried to cover it up," she said.  

"On March 26th, one week ago, I called you and told you about the need to get the film from the camera in Isham Park in order to review if for illegal activity.," Ms. Ryan wrote to Jeniffer Hoppa,  Administrator Northern Manhattan Parks.

"You told me by phone on March 26th that you would follow up to get access to the film in order to give the film to the 34th precinct for their review.  I followed up on March 27th by email and you did reply saying that you were meeting with the camera contractor on March 28th. 

This is now the 3rd email I have had to send to you since that time in order to find out what is going on with the video footage from that camera and the availability of it's review for the NYPD.

It is very unsettling that this information has not been forthcoming and that it has been so challenging to get what should be basic, readily available information.

It is especially concerning in light of not just what happened to my husband, but to several community members who have been victims of crimes in Isham Park and who are all community stake holders who have legitimate concerns about Park Safety in Isham Park and the effect that illegal activity in the park has for us all," she wrote.


The camera records from 1am to 5am.


Mrs. Ryan said the Park manager refused to respond to questions via email and said she would only discuss the matter by phone.  

"….I feel that advertising/posting what the two cameras NYC Parks has purchased for Isham Park do and dont cover and when would minimize their effectiveness as a crime deterrent," wrote Jeniffer Hoppa,  Administrator Northern Manhattan Parks in a April 3rd email to Mrs. Ryan.

Ms. Hoppa then represented that she had informed several other community members about the camera. However Mrs. Ryan said when her neighbors were contacted to confirm this they said this issue had not been discussed with Ms. Hoppa.

"For the last couple of months I've been trying to get basic information. They haven't given me anything. The purpose of the camera is to make people safer.  I feel betrayed by them.  For the  last 10 or 11 months this community has been under the impression that the camera is actually working.  

They (Parks Department)  lied to us. It's makes me really angry. They knew that camera did not work."

Michael O'Reilly who had his nose broken in the June mugging which required surgery also feels betrayed.

"It seems a reasonable assumption that the camera I and all my neighbors have walked passed the last 9 or 10 months is actually recording information during the daylight hours and into the early evening when the majority of the crimes have taken place, " Mr.  O'Reilly said.

"Alas it feels like a betrayal of trust in the park departments ability to take any real effectual action to make the park safer." 

Ms. Ryan said yesterday after the Daily News ran a story a nieghbor sent her an email blasting the DPR's "excuse" for not having adequate memory to record from the tax payer funded camera.

"At my home our nanny cam records 36 hours continuously at 30fps with 4 GB. This means they only have same ~4GB capacity -- maybe smaller?   I think 128 GB SDHX cards are $120 on amazon. Or that much space on a big disk drive is practically free. You can also turn down fps from say 30 to 20 and get a boost in capacity. $30k and they cheap out on storage."   

J.A. Reynolds, an Inwood resident for 45 years has been volunteering in the park since 1970 when he and his wife and then 5-year-old son began cleaning up debris. They eventually built one of the city's first community gardens from a former garbage strewn part of the park, a garden that still flourishes today. 

"I've known about the crime for 40 years," said Mr. Reynolds who pointed out the need for greater maintenance to help improve park safety. 

"I'd like to see the Forestry Department do their job," he said adding the increased visibility and site lines would help.
   
He said the area of the park where they created the garden was filled with dumped automobile parts and kitchen appliances  people had thrown out of windows. 

His son Bruce, who grew up to be a Port Authority police officer,  tragically died on 9/11. The garden is named after him in his honor. 

Mr. Ryan and other community residents are organizing around the greater need for park maintenance and safety. 

On April 3, NYC Park Advocates asked the Parks Department's press office seven questions. Parks Commissioner Veronica White, Speaker Quinn and Juli Wood from the Mayor's office were also cc:ed. 



On April 12th - after repeated inquires - Arthur Pincus for the Parks Department responded.
They refused to answer all but a half of one question.  

"There are two cameras in Isham Park.  One is located at Memorial Circle, where the incident you referenced took place.  It carries a 24-hour live feed and we are working to ensure that the NYPD has access to that feed.  It can record various time periods and we are coordinating the appropriate time periods with the NYPD to maximize the camera's effectiveness. However, we will not announce the specific hours that the camera records as that would hinder its effectiveness as a deterrent. 


The second camera in Isham Park is a flash cam.  It is located at Park Terrace East Circle.  It takes photographs at night and serves as a deterrent for people to leave the park after its closure." 

On April 12th in response I wrote:

Dear Arthur,

I asked seven questions and only one of them was answered and only partially.

Question: 1. Can someone explain why the camera is not on 24/7.  You responded that the camera carries a 24-hour live feed but you did not say whether or not it was in fact on 24/7 and/or if that feed was being monitored for that entire 24 hours time frame.   You did not explain why it can  "record various time periods" but why is wasn't recording 24/7 and being monitored  24/7.

Questions: 2 -5  I would also like to know the hours the camera is in operation, the date it was installed, the cost, and by whom and how the camera is being monitored.    Non of these questions were answered.

With regard to one of them you state,  "we will not announce the specific hours that the camera records as that would hinder its effectiveness as a deterrent."

This response is irresponsible and unacceptable on many levels.  I won't even bother to respond accept to state the obvious: If the Parks Department was interested in using the camera as an effective deterrent than the camera's feed would run 24/7 and be monitored during that time instead of for four hours during the night when the park is closed and when no one is in and when no crime occurs.  The camera was purchased as a deterrent as well very importantly to help the police solve any crimes that occur in the vicinity.  Clearly with these extremely limited hours the camera is not serving that purpose, and we are demanding to know why.

The community as well as law enforcement has a right to know why. They must also be given every tool available to help make our community's safer.

Your refusal to release the hours is made all the more ridiculous considering the information you are desperately trying to prevent the public being made aware of I already know.  Why your agency continues to insist on this gotcha  mentality is beyond me. 

Again, your response to our request is clearly an effort to withhold information that is critical to the public's safety.  The community has depended on that camera being usable which includes producing data to aid law enforcement 24/7.   Your agency is further putting the public in danger by withholding these facts.  

We will not accept any attempts by your office to cover up, prevent , or delay the release of this important public safely information. 

The pubic has every right to know that the camera they bought is not being used properly why. Trying to cover that up is unacceptable.  It is deplorable you are  still attempting to withhold this information. 

Note: To date we have received no further response.

Read More:


New York Daily News - June 2, 2013 -  By Thomas Tracy 

DNAinfo has reported on numerious incdents over the last few years.   



Monday, October 1, 2012

Man's Decomposed Body Found In Inwood Hill Park


Body in Inwood Hill Park
Police investigate the discovery of 78-year-old Inwood resident Seyed Ali Badakhshan's body in Inwood Hill Park. His body was found this morning by a dog walker. Police said he was camping in the park.  Mr. Badakhshan lived on Riverside Drive a few blocks away from the park. (Photos: Bruce Katz/DNAinfo)   


Seyed Ali Badakhshan Missing Inwood Man
According to DNAinfo Mr. Badakhshan had been missing since September 17th.


UPDATE


By Geoffrey Croft

The body of an inwood resident was found by a dog walker this morning around 8:00am, NYC Park Advocates has learned. 

According to law enforcement sources the badly decomposed body has been identified as Seyed Ali Badakhshan. 

His body was found in a wooded area approximately 100 west of the Henry Hudson Parkway and 50 yards East of the Railroad Bridge at the very tip of Manhattan.

According to police EMS responded and pronounced him DOA.  The investigation is on going and the medical examiner will determine the cause of death. 


Badakhshan was reported missing on Sept. 17 and was last seen at 10:30 p.m. that evening on the corner of Henshaw Street and Riverside Drive, according to DNainfo.  

An Inwood resident walking his dog noticed Badakhshan's body off a pathway near Dyckman Street and Henry Hudson Parkway just after 8 a.m. Monday, police said.

Authorities found a tent in a secluded section of the woods near where he was found. Sources said they believe he had been camping in the park. It was not immediately clear how long his body had been in the woods before it was found.

Cops do not suspect foul play, but the investigation is ongoing. The medical examiner will determine the cause of the death.
A woman who asked not to be identified said she and her husband lived in Badakhshan's building for two years.

"He was a sweety," she said. "He would try to hold the door open for you even though you were probably more capable than he was."

Badakhshan's body was found not far from the area where Juilliard student Sarah Fox's body was found after her murder in 2004.

That case remains unsolved. The two are not believed to be connected in any way, sources said.

Body in Inwood Hill Park
The Office of the Medical Examiner arrives at the scene.


Read More:

Police ID Body of Man Found in Inwood Hill Park
DNAinfo - October 1, 2012 - By Carla Zanoni

Police find body in Inwood Hill Park 
Metro NY - October 1, 2012 -  By Alison Bowen   

New York Post - October 2, 2012 - By Jessica Simeone, Natasha Velez 

NY1 News - October 1, 2012

WNBC - October 1, 2012  - By Shimon Prokupecz 

New York Daily News - October 1, 2012- By Rocco Parascandola  

2 Октября, 2012, Автор: Александр Грант