Showing posts with label Paul Graziano. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Graziano. Show all posts

Friday, October 7, 2016

Building Not Inspected Where Parks Worker Was Injured In Queens



Parks worker Cory Credell, 45, (above) fell though a floorboard while working in an unsafe building in Fort Totten after it had supposedly been inspected and cleared to work in by the head of the parks Department’s Health and Safety division.
Cordell was stuck between the 1st floor and basement and had to extracted by FDNY after falling through a hole in the floor.   (Photos: NYC Park Advocates) Click on images to enlarge


Queens

By Geoffrey Croft

Parks workers were sent into a crumbling building after the head of the Parks Department’s Health and Safety division had falsely indicated that she had inspected it and was safe, NYC Park Advocates has learned.  

On Monday a Parks Department worker had to be rescued by the Fire Department after falling through the floorboard of a rotted, feces invested building in Fort Totten Park in the northeastern section of Queens. 

Park workers say they were forced to work in the decrepit building even after protesting and sending photographic evidence to their supervisors that showed the building was dangerous.

They also say they were forced to work despite not having the proper training or equipment - no face ventilators - just a paper mask. 

The worker fell through a rotten floor board after Parks Department’s Health & Safety division head Nancy Barthold allegedly inspected the building on Friday and gave the workers the go-ahead to clean the toxic building.

Days after the incident Barthold admitted that she in fact had not gone into the building where the worker was injured and it was not inspected NYC Park Advocates has learned.

Park workers arrived on Monday morning around 9:00am and had to use a crow bar to gain entry to the putrid smelling dwelling which was filled with raccoon and other animal feces.  

The rotton floor where park worker Corey Credell fell through. 

Once inside they saw a hole in the floor and a large hole in the ceiling that went through to the roof.  They immediately notified their supervisor.

One of the workers texted photos of the condition to their supervisor,  Northeast Queens Parks Administrator, Matt Symons.  

When workers balked at the dangerous work assignment Symons produced an email from Nancy Barthold giving them the ok.  

One employee still refused to work in the unsafe conditions.

Cory Credell, 45, went inside and began to sweep and shovel the toxic fecal dust with a push broom when the floor suddenly caved in causing him to get stuck up to his waste between the first floor and the basement.

“The floor just gave way, ” he recalled after returning home from the hospital. 


Parks worker Corey Credell lies on a board beside the hole he feel in after being extracted by the FDNY.


“I was cleaning the area and then I feel through the floor. That’s when I hurt my back, my neck. I hit my knee on the water pipe that was under the floor.

I was yelling in pain.”

His colleagues had trouble reaching him due to the precarious condition of the floor.

One attempted and approached from the back but he threw out his back out trying to lift Corey out who was lodged in the floor.  

“He was trying to lift me through the floor but it was too painful,” Credell said.

Another co-worker ran across the street and got the fire department who have several operations facilities nearby.  

FDNY personell arrived quickly. They put a board across a beam and were able to extract him.

On Friday an APSW park worker refused to work in the building and a supervisor overseeing welfare workers (JTP’s)  pulled her workers out due to the obvious safety hazards. 

But that did not deter Parks' Heath and Safety.

“Went through the house,”  Nancy Barthold wrote to Matt Symons Northeast Queens Parks Administrator, on Friday September 30th in an email obtained by NYC Park Advocates.

“The staff can clean in there as long as they are suited up and take frequent breaks and as long as its not just JTP’s…there should be a good representation of full time workers on the job,” she wrote regarding the CLEANING of 429/430 building properties in Fort Totten,  ignoring the obvious safety issues. 


The Ceiling. (Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) Click on images to enlarge


On Sunday Matt Symons forwarded the email to additional supervisors.

“From Nancy,”  Symons wrote to two additional supervisors,  “Please plan the completion of the project on the next rainy day.  Thanks,” 

On Monday the city tried again and this time sending in City Park Workers (CPW’s) to the job. 

“We let our supervisors know that the conditions were horrible. Then they came to us with an email from the health and safety inspector saying that we could do it,” said Corey who began letting the Parks Department and his union rep know about the conditions shorty after 9:00am.

“Then they came to us with an email from the health and safety inspector saying that we could do it.”

Corey said a co-worker texted back to say that the structure of the building is bad,  “but we were still told to go in there and work. Matt Symons texted and said we got the ok from Nancy Barthold.  He said we got an email from her saying its ok to work in there.”

The email was blindly relied on by supervisors to represent that the building had been inspected and that it was safe for employees to work in said Corey.  

“She couldn’t have went into 429 if she’d went into to 429 as soon as you go in you see the holes in the roof.  I know she went to building 430.  There’s no way she could have gone into 429 and deemed it safe.”

It turns out she hadn’t been in the building.

Ms. Barhold admitted during a meeting on Wednesday with Union DC 37 Health and Safety officials that she hadn’t gone into the building according to several people who attended the meeting.  

“Unbelievable,”  fumed Dilcy Benn, president of Local 1505 which represents CPW’s and who attended the meeting.

“What person in the right mind would say this building is safe, the smell alone would kill you.” she said. 

I’m appalled that they would send my people in there with holes and without the proper equipment,”  she continued.  

“It’s insane. The building should have been tested for lead and asbestos.  They cleared my workers to go in there. They don’t care. This is not the first time his has happened."

The house was littered with fecal matter. Steps leading to the second floor after workers began to sweep. 

Ms. Benn said she tried to reach Nancy Barthold for more than six hours on Monday starting before the employees began to work but she was nowhere to be found. 

“Nancy Barthold should be held accountable,” she said.   

The workers were also sent in there wearing only a thin paper mask.

“Its an old building, does it have asbestos, lead, I know it has mildew. Weeds are growing through the floor, “  said Credell who is also currently being treated for prostate cancer.

“The smell is horrible, horrible,” he said noting that the building’s only ventilation come from the holes in the building. 
 “We asked about the ventilator masks but they said this mask is sufficient. We asked about that several times.  Ben Gonzalez (a supervisor) tried to help get the proper masks but from what I was told Jimmy Ekhard said, ’that’s good enough.”’ 

As long as the job gets done they don’t give a damn. I’m pissed off about it.”   

To add insult to injury Corey said he is also upset over how he was treated after the accident by a Parks Department supervisor. 

Although the park headquarters is fifty yards away Corey said his supervisor James Ekhard never bothered to check to see how he was doing. 

“He never left his desk to come see how I’m doing. How do you not come see how I’m doing. First off all you can’t get off your ass to see the building.    

Corey said another suporvisor came from across town to see how he was doing and accompanied him to the hospital.  

"Its crazy, I’m highly pissed off about it. It makes me what to change agencies. They don’t care about us.  You have a fit ready to write me up when I come in late or call out yet you send me into a building that dangerous to my life.” 

The Parks Department is required to have safety protocols in place which were clearly not in evidence but the fact that permission and pressure to work in the building came from the head of the agency’s health and safety division is particularly infuriating.

“You didn’t give a dam about my livelihood,  You didn’t give a damn about my health or my life,” Corey said.  

“You wrote that email saying its safe, you didn’t give a s**t. You didn’t care who got hurt, who got killed, nothing. How can you give an order like when you didn’t even check it out. Can you explain that. "     

Despite several requests the Parks Department refused to even acknowledge several attempts seeking comment for this story including what, if any disciplinary action would be taken against Nancy Barthold.

“Safety is NYC Parks’ first priority,” the Parks Department’s press office said in a much used statement  released to several media outlets.   

“While no major injuries were sustained yesterday at Fort Totten, we are reevaluating and reinforcing our safety procedures on this project.” 

Mr. Credell scoffed at the agency’s statement.

"How can they say, ‘no serious injures.”  Nobody from parks came to see how I was going.  How can they even say that. They don’t feel my pain.

“I feel angry and deceived, “ he continued.

"Action speaks louder than words. If safety is first how do you hire someone that doesn’t do their job. How do you get around that.  This lady was hired - health and safety that’s big.   How can you preach safety is their first priority. They don’t give a damn about us because if they did she would have done her job.

She’s the head of Health and Safety. So if she doesn’t do her job what about the people that are under her. You lead by example. 

The Parks Department says their first priority is safety.  That wasn’t done in this case. So now I want to know I’m going through this pain and suffering I’m the one that’s hurt, pain the suffering, what’s going to happen to her,  still getting her pay check every two weeks.

I’m in major pain, my back and neck,”  says Corey who is expected to be out for at least a month.

But it could have been even worse.

He says a worker had begun cleaning the feces from the steps leading up to the building’s second story where the floor was far more dangerous and where they were going to next. 

“Had we started from top to bottom it would have been a different,” he said. 

“It really could have been death and it goes back to again, her (Nancy) not giving a s**t about nobody. She really doesn’t care. The only thing she cares about is getting a paycheck every two weeks.

Someone has to be accountable for it.” 

Letting The Buildings Rot

The Civil War-era military Fort Totten property contains dozens of buildings many of which are falling apart. 

The incident occurred in Building 429, located on the corner of Whistler Avenue & Walter Reed Rd. in one of three remaining Capehart Houses that were built in 1959 for use as military housing. The city removed all but three of the houses and restored the area to green space but have failed to maintain the buildings since taking them over.




The incident occurred in building 429 one of three remaining Capehart Houses that were built in 1959 for military housing.    The nondescript two story building is on the corner of Whistler Avenue & Walter Reed Rd.   The city has failed to maintain the buildings since taking them over. (Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) Click on images to enlarge


“It’s a problem,”  said Paul Graziano, a founding member of the Fort Totten Conservancy which fought for years to preserve the area and get it designated into a public park and historic district. 
    
“A lot of the buildings are crumbing the city is not taking care of them,”  he said. 

“Most the buildings are essentially being left to rot.   They’re not being maintained by the city resulting in the incident that happened with the park worker.” 

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Lawsuit Filed To Stop Mega-Mall In Flushing Meadows-Corona Park


The Bloomberg Administration and the City Council are attempting to hand over 47. 5 acres of Flushing Meadows - Corona Park worth $ 1 billion dollars to The Related Companies and Sterling Equities to build a 1.4 million sq. ft. mall known as Willets Point West. They are attempting to push this through without receiving any approvals or even voting on the massive project.  

Queens

A coalition of area residents,  environmental groups, business and home owners, and State Senator Tony Avella filed a lawsuit in New York County Supreme Court on Monday demanding the City halt its illegal handing over of mapped Parkland to build a mega-mall.

The suit also asks the Court to nullify actions taken by the Planning Commission, and approved by the Council in October of last year, to permit construction of parking facilities in Willets Point in lieu of the affordable housing and supportive facilities called for by the 2008 plan. 

The complaint alleges that the project cannot proceed without approval by the State Legislature under the “public trust” doctrine that protects all parkland throughout the State against non-park uses without the consent of the Legislature which was not requested or obtained.

The Bloomberg Administration and the City Council are attempting to hand over 47.5 acres of Flushing Meadows - Corona Park in Queens worth $ 1 billion dollars to The Related Companies and Sterling Equities to build a 1.4 million sq. ft. mall known as Willets Point West.   They are attempting achieve this without receiving any approvals or even voting on the project.  

The complaint also alleges violations of the City’s Zoning Resolution and Charter, and seeks annulment of approvals granted by the City to date for the related Willets Point plan.

In October the City Council approved zoning amendments to the Willet's Point plan,  allowing a multi-phased development and temporary parking on part of the Willets point site.   These amendments however do not permit the building of a massive 1.4-million-square-foot shopping mall much less a massive 1.4 million square foot shopping mall on mapped parkland.


Related Companies and Sterling Equities are attempting to build a 1.4 million square foot mall on 47.5 acres of mapped parkland in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park, west of Citi-Field stadium.  This represents the largest public parkland giveaway in recent history. The proposed project would allow the seizing of the public parkland to be used exclusively for non-park purposes without first getting State Alienation approval as is required under the law.  The construction of such a mall on public parkland would be unprecedented. (Photos: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates) 



The Bloomberg administration and the City Council are attempting to bypass land use procedures including the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP),  and  state law which requires State Alienation legislation approval to use parkland for non-park purposes.   Mayor Bloomberg claimed all land use powers of the former Board of Estimate as belonging to him, clearly a violation of ULURP.  

From 1964 to 2006,  30.7 of the 47.5 acres of the site near the northerly end of the Park was occupied by Shea Stadium.  When Shea was demolished and replaced in 2009 by Citi Field at a location slightly east of the Shea site, the project site became a parking field for visitors to Citi Field.  The site has also been used for a variety of public recreational events including foot races, circus performances, an annual wheelchair baseball game, and concerts.

In 2012, Sterling Equities and the Related Companies convinced the Bloomberg administration to allow the massive shopping mall on Park property.

In October Council member Julissa Ferreras attempted to justify and explain why the public parkland was now part of the deal and was given away - the developers and the Mayor wanted it.   

"The mall is something that the developers and the administration believe is necessary to be able to support the build-out of Willets Point,"  she said.  

In 2008 the City Council approved a Willets Point plan to place the intended retail development in the neighboring Willets Point development project along with affordable housing, the Park was never part of the project.


Delivering The Deal.  Big Winners. A beaming Related Companies' Charles  J.  O'Byrne, Queens City Council member Julissa Ferreras,  Jeff Wilpon - New York Mets COO and the executive vice-president of Sterling Equities and son of New York Mets principal owner Fred Wilpon, and Glenn  A. Goldstein - president of Related Retail and registered lobbyist pose on October 8th shortly after the City Council vote. (Photo: William Alatriste /New York City Council) 



“Parks are intended to serve the people, to provide open space, landscaping, opportunities for recreation, playgrounds for children, and escape from the hordes and noise of a busy commercial city," said State Senator Tony Avella, a plaintiff in the suit.   

"The only commercial uses that belong in them are those, such as snack stands, that enhance the park experience.  A shopping center is not one of them.  We have a wonderful law that is supposed to assure all of this, known as the ‘public trust doctrine.’  I’m outraged when the people who are supposed to administer parks for everyone turn them over to private interests without seeking the State Legislature's consent as the public trust doctrine requires.  So, I am very pleased to be a party to this action.” the Senator said.

The contention that the 1961 law exempts this transaction from the public trust doctrine, says John Low-Beer, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers, is wrong. 

“The 1961 law was intended to allow a stadium and uses directly related to a stadium, such as parking, concessions, and other commercial activity typically incidental to a professional sports arena.”

Low-Beer adds that the 1961 law “says nothing about a shopping center.  In fact, the Legislature explicitly prohibited any purely commercial uses other than ones strictly related to the stadium, such as concession stands.  The public trust doctrine requires that any legislative consent be very specific about what it will allow.  If it doesn’t specify a use, then that use is not permitted.”

The suit was filed on behalf of State Senator Tony Avella, The City Club of New York, NYC Park Advocates, a City-wide parks advocacy group that helped to establish “Save Flushing Meadows Park.” 

The plaintiffs include Paul Graziano, Ben Haber, and Alfredo Centola who have prominently opposed a spate of recent proposals for new or enlarged sports venues in the Park, as well as the shopping center.

The efforts of “Save Flushing Meadows Park,” a coalition of many Queens civic groups and individuals helped thwart the proposed professional soccer stadium, though it was unable to stop a half-acre expansion of the Tennis Center.  Several of the plaintiffs have also led opposition to the shopping center.

Other plaintiffs are individuals and businesses falling into several categories including nearby residents, park users, and businesses along Roosevelt Avenue and in Willets Point having special concerns about traffic and business displacement.

The efforts of the “Save Flushing Meadows Park” group were recently bolstered by the City Club which took on the shopping center as a major project after successfully participating in a campaign to defeat a proposed upzoning of the East Midtown area around Grand Central Terminal that would have doubled the permissible bulk in much of the area.  After Council leaders announced in early November that the Council would vote against the plan, Mayor Bloomberg withdrew it.

Michael Gruen, President of the City Club, said that the City Club joined the shopping center fight out of concern that “Flushing Meadows Park has long suffered from neglect in maintenance and from getting eaten away as a recreational park by a voracious assumption that every new idea for a commercial sporting activity should be given a home in this one Park.

The proposed  1.4 million square foot retail and entertainment development was approved by the City Planning Commission on Wednesday.


Fortunately some of the worst, such as a proposed “grand prix” race track around the lake, have been defeated.  But this is a beautiful park and it deserves much better treatment.”

Gruen added that the City Club sees the shopping center project as “perhaps the most egregious example of commercialization of parkland throughout the city.  There are places where the annual cycle of fashion shows and holiday bazaars leave little time for enjoying the open space and landscaping. That it is the worst of a pattern of treating parkland as an asset to be sold off for commercial use caused us to take it on so that we could get the courts to draw a clear line:  commercial uses that do not enhance the recreational experience of parks do not belong in the parks.”

Gruen said that the City Club hopes “clearly to confirm that any alienation of parkland requires legislative action, very specifically stating what uses are to be allowed.  The legislative consent must then be construed narrowly by the courts so that ambiguities in statutory language cannot be exploited, as the developers here are trying to do, to justify other commercial uses that the legislature had no evident intention of condoning.”

The case is filed in the New York County Supreme Court.  John Low-Beer, Lorna Goodman and Meredith Feinman represent the plaintiffs.

The complaint asks the Court to declare that the shopping mall project is illegal and to enjoin further steps toward its construction without compliance with applicable law including the public trust doctrine, and without imposing appropriate zoning regulations on the site.

It also asks the Court to nullify actions taken by the Planning Commission, and approved by the Council in October of last year, to permit construction of parking facilities in Willets Point in lieu of the affordable housing and supportive facilities called for by the 2008 plan.  The complaint asserts that the Commission and Council knew that the changes in the Willets Point plan were needed for no other purpose than to accommodate stadium parking displaced by the intended shopping center, and knew that the shopping center project itself is illegal without approval of the legislature.

They knew that their action would facilitate illegal construction of the shopping mall, the promoters of which had clearly stated their belief that they could proceed with without legislative approval.  The Commission and Council thereby acted illegally, and arbitrarily and capriciously.

The Related Companies and Sterling Equities just got approval to build this mall on the western parking lot of Citi Field.
The proposed mall across from CitiField.

Read More:


New York Post  - February 11, 2014 - By Minsi Chung

New York Daily News -  February 11, 2014 - By Beth Stebner   

Queens  Chronicle -  February 10, 2014  by Peter C. Mastrosimone 

DNAinfo - February 11, 2014 - By Katie Honan

City Limits - By Patrick Arden

Legal questions emerge about Citi Field mall 
City Limits - By Patrick Arden
Facebook


Friday, August 9, 2013

Willets Point Land Grab In Flushing Meadows Park Blasted

"Willets West is a scandal and the conspirators should not be rewarded for their illegal scheme. The city council must vote, No-and let the next mayor sort out this scandal,"  - Irene Presti  - Willets Point property owner


 The City Planning Commission kicked off the land use review process on Monday for a sweeping proposal by the Queens Development Group — a joint venture between Sterling Equities and the Related Cos. — to redevelop Willets Point.

Under the proposal a massive 1.4 million sq. ft. mall would be built by Bloomberg-preferred developer the Related Companies in partnership with Sterling Equities, the real estate firm controlled by the owner of the Mets,  in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park on parkland currently used for Citi-Field parking.   In 2008 the Council approved the Willets Point redevelopment application but the Flushing Meadows-Corona Park acreage was not part of the plan.  The city is desperately trying to rely on a 1961 bill that never replaced parkland used for Shea Stadium. Critics of the plan argue that if the 40-plus acres being proposed for mall use are no longer needed for parking then it should revert back to its original recreational use. 



























Willet's Point business owner Jamie Sabetti holds up an eviction notice from HPD at Wednesday's press conference where he spoke passionately about having thirty days to vacate and not being compensated.   

"We rely on these jobs. We don't know where we are going to go," said Mr. Sabetti. "Officials hear us but they do nothing."


Willets Point United Inc. were joined by organizations representing more than 100 civic organizations, park advocates and civic leaders to oppose "the corrupt bargain at Willets West and Willets Point."

Queens

By Geoffrey Croft

Opponents of the Willet's Point West attempted land grab in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park gathered on the steps of City Hall on Wednesday and voiced their overwhelming opposition toward the mega-development project planned on more than 30 acres of public parkland.  

Under the proposal a massive 1.4 million sq. ft. mall would be built in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park on parkland currently used for Citi-Field parking.   The majority of the land for the $3 billion Willets Point project would be taken from the public parkland.  

Critics of the plan argue that if the 40-plus acres being proposed for mall use are no longer needed for parking then it should revert back to its original recreational use. 

The City and Bloomberg-preferred developer the Related Companies in partnership with Sterling Equities, the real estate firm controlled by the owner of the Mets -  are attempting this without seeking State Alienation legislation as is required under state law to use parkland for non-park purposes. 

Sign On The Times.  Willet's Point business owner Jerry Antonacci blasted City Council member Julissa Ferreras for not protecting the parkland and business owners.


In 2008 the City Council approved the Willets Point redevelopment application but the Flushing Meadows-Corona Park acreage was not part of the plan.

Since then a new scheme was hatched involving the mega-developer and the owner of the Mets which does not resemble the project orginally approved in any way.

In the public parkland givaway the city is now desperately trying to rely on a 1961 bill that never replaced parkland used for Shea Stadium.   

The 1961 statute that the city and the applicants are desperately trying to rely on in order to justify being allowed to develop the public parkland for non-park purposes does not permit a shopping mall.   Administrative Code 18-118 explicitly states that any monies gained from a temporary lease on the property must go back into the property.

Back into the property not line the pockets of Related or Sterling Equity.   

The revenue must aid "in the financing of the construction and operation of such stadium, grounds, parking areas and facilities, and any additions, alterations or improvements thereto, or to the equipment thereof,"  the law states.  

Clearly this is not the case.  

The intention of the law was not to allow any project to make a permanent claim on the parkland or its facilities, because the revenue was supposed to fund the property.

Sorry, image not available


The largest of the three projects being proposed in Flushing Meadows Corona Park - Willets Point West - would seize more than 30 acres of public parkland to build the City's largest mall at 1.4 million Square feet.  The city has been chipping away at the only green space many Queens residents have since Robert Moses remade it for the World’s Fairs in 1939 and 1964.   The developers first choice was to build an enormous casino project documents show.


Yesterday Willets Point United Inc. were joined by numerous organizations including Queens Civic Congress, New York City Park Advocates, members of Community Board 3, local tenant business owners, South Bronx Unite, Good Jobs NY, Save Flushing Meadows Corona Park,  and elected officials State Senator Tony Avella and City Comptroller John Liu.

Willets Point United Inc. is the property and business owners’ group that has been fighting the redevelopment of the Iron Triangle for over five years.

"What was never contemplated was that you would take parkland and built a parking mall," said Willets Point United's David Schwartz.

"This is a favor to Sterling Equities and the Wilpon family that should not be allowed to happen," he said. 

Willets Point property owner Irene Presti blasted the deal calling it,  "illegal and unethical."  saying that the Bloomberg administration is putting forward to develop the Iron Triangle, in violation of not only the not for profit lobbying laws of New York State; but by the brazen violation of Federal law. 

"In order to promote this dirty deal the city helped to set up a phony not for profit local development group headed by Claire Shulman. The group, made up of rich developers with the names Muss, Wilpon, Mattone and TDC, was never anything but a not for profit but in name only-it was put in place to advance the special interest of its real estate company members. Incredibly, NYC EDC forwarded $500,000 in tax payer funds to finance this illegal lobbying scheme."

She pointed out that  in July 2012, NY State Attorney General  Eric Schneiderman cited the violation of the law but, shamefully, failed to do anything to sanction the illegal behavior. 

"Willets West is a scandal and the conspirators should not be rewarded for their illegal scheme. The city council must vote, No-and let the next mayor sort out this scandal."

"We see that Mr. Wilpon of the Mets-the prime mover of the illegal lobbying group- has been awarded the development rights to Willets West and $200 million worth of property for $1. And there is no one with the courage to step in and put an end to this criminal scheme. Who says crime doesn’t pay?" 

Long-time critic State Senator Tony Avella called the plan a disgrace.

“Park land should be sacred,”  said State Senator Tony Avella who was only one of two City Council members who originally voted against the project. 

“The proposed Willets West Mall is part of the biggest land grab for parkland not only in Queens but in the entire City.  I voted against the original Willets Point project as a member of the City Council because, among other things, the City was using eminent domain to take private property and give it to private developers without a public benefit.  Now, the City is proposing to give away sacred parkland for private development.  That is simply unacceptable and I am proud to stand here today with Willets Point United in strong opposition to this project.” 

“This is the classic bait and switch," City Comptroller John Liu stated.  

"Because what we were promised by the administration is no longer. What's now remaining in this current plan that the administration would like to go forward with is but a semblance of what the original plan was. This has to be stopped. It is not right. It should not go forward,” the  Comptroller said. 

"We should not be encroaching on parkland illegally against New York State law," said City Comptroller John Liu.


"I want to call out one person Julissa Ferreras...for five years she's done nothing,"  said     Willet's Point business owner Jerry Antonacci.

"Everything is wrong with this and she still stands by this project. I want to know when is she going to come out and stand by the people in her community and say no, enough is enough.  Five years of lies,  five years of broken promises and do what her community voted for her to do and that's vote this down," he said.

"There's clearly no equity or no interest  in protecting the public, there's no interest  in protecting parkland, there's no interest  in protecting jobs,"  said Save Flushing Meadows Corona Park's Paul Graziano.

"There's no interest  in protecting community that use the park which desperately need it because they don't have their own places to have recreation. " 

"This is an outrageous deal," said Jackson Heights Beautification Group and CB 3 board member, Ed Westly.

"We expect our City Council member Elizabeth Crowley to vote against this project and we urge the rest to do the same," said Communities of Maspeth and Elmhurst Together's (COMET) Christina Wilkinson.

"The process has not been at all lead by the community which is  not news to anyone here,"  commented Bettina Damiani of Good Jobs NY. 

"But this is unfortunately what the Bloomberg administration has done over and over again."

"Because we are Spanish, Latino's,  we don't need those kinds of discriminations,"  said  Willet's Point business owner Marco Neira,  "they are stealing our businesses, they are stealing our lives."


"It is the position of Willets Point United Inc. that the present land use application of Sterling Equities and Related Companies should be denied, and that a new Request for Proposals should be issued and new developer responses solicited – responses that conform to the property boundaries and the goals approved by the Council in 2008," Willets Point United said in a statement.

"Moreover, any selection of a developer must take place with the participation of the Willets Point Advisory Committee and Queens elected officials, as had been promised by the City administration in writing during 2008 but disregarded when Sterling and Related – and their plan to site a huge mall on parkland – were chosen."

Critics denounced numerous issues regarding the Willets Point redevelopment project including:

  1. This was not the deal that the Council approved: The affordable housing component has been delayed and subject to escape clauses, and the agreed living wage provision has been eliminated;
  2. No project - let alone a 1.4 million square foot mall - should be built on public parkland;
  3. The City Administrative Code does not authorize or provide any legal basis for the construction of a mall on 30+ acres of parkland, in violation of the parkland Public Trust Doctrine;
  4. No massive development should be built in this area without new access ramps being built to and from the Van Wyck Expressway before any other construction;
  5. No private property should be taken to merely be paved over as a parking lot;
6.      Developers Sterling and Related were selected via a process that excluded the Willets Point Advisory Committee and Queens officials – contrary to written promises made by the City administration in 2008;
  1. The City must be compensated for the $200 million it has spent to buy Willets Point property;
  2. No team of billionaire developers should be given said property as a $1 gift;
  3. No developer who was part of an illegal lobbying scheme should be allowed to profit for engaging in the illegality;
  4. No development deal based on an illegal lobbying scheme should be approved by the City Council


Press Conference Statement from Irene Presti, Willets Point property owner



My name is Irene Presti and I own property at Willets Point that is threatened by the illegal and unethical deal that the Bloomberg administration has put forward to develop the Iron Triangle. That’s right, the entire development was promoted by a violation of not only the not for profit lobbying laws of New York State; but by the brazen violation of Federal law as well.


In order to promote this dirty deal the city helped to set up a phony not for profit local development group headed by Claire Shulman. The group, made up of rich developers with the names Muss, Wilpon, Mattone and TDC, was never anything but a not for profit but in name only-it was put in place to advance the special interest of its real estate company members. Incredibly, NYC EDC forwarded $500,000 in tax payer funds to finance this illegal lobbying scheme.

Unfortunately, this LDC was barred from doing any legal lobbying from the standpoint of the NY State law on local development corporations. Don’t just take my word for it. In July of 2012, the NY State Attorney General cited the violation of the law but, shamefully, failed to do anything to sanction the illegal behavior.

Apparently, some people are considered to be above the law and the AG even failed to demand that the Shulman group refund the illegal contribution from EDC and the tax payers. So small property owners like myself were forced to fend off the big real estate companies who were publicly funded in the campaign to take away my property.

But it gets worse folks. When the Shulman group filed for tax exempt status with the IRS there are two important boxes it checked. The first was: Will you be doing any lobbying? The second was: will you be doing any economic development? The group, lying through its teeth, answered no to both questions-even though Shulman told the NY Times that the entire purpose of the group was to lobby for the Willets Point project.

Did the IRS act on this blatant violation of the federal not for profit laws? Not on your life. It was busy chasing the Tea Party and didn’t have the time to investigate and punish a clear violation of law. So on the state and the federal level, law enforcement is a partisan activity and justice be damned!

Now, however, it gets much worse. We see that Mr. Wilpon of the Mets-the prime mover of the illegal lobbying group- has been awarded the development rights to Willets West and $200 million worth of property for $1. And there is no one with the courage to step in and put an end to this criminal scheme. Who says crime doesn’t pay?

Not only that, but the entire original development deal has been changed in a breathless bait and switch that has eliminated the affordable housing and living wage pledges that were the heart of the approval in 2008. Instead of the “next green neighborhood” we have been given a huge mall and a parking lot. For this we are abusing the eminent domain process?

I am a proud member of Willets Point United. If my group had done what EDC, Wilpon and Shulman have conspired to do, we would be under arrest and awaiting trial. Instead, Shulman remains at large and Wilpon is poised to reap billions of dollars for evading the law and ripping off the tax payers.

Willets West is a scandal and the conspirators should not be rewarded for their illegal scheme. The city council must vote, No-and let the next mayor sort out this scandal.



Critics of the plan argue that if the 30-plus acres being proposed for mall use are no longer needed for Citi-Field parking then it should revert back to its original recreational use.   (Photo: Geoffrey Croft/NYC Park Advocates)

Read More:


Flushing Meadows Park Development Projects Blasted
A Walk In The Park  - July 24, 2013 

City Begins Land Use Process On Willets Point Land Grab
A Walk In The Park  - March 22, 2013  - By Geoffrey Croft


City Limits - July 30, 2012 - By Pat Arden